April 3, 201313 yr That's why we do not give them that chance. We use enough bombs to annihilate them. I agree with other countries having the same weapons making this harder.
April 3, 201313 yr Much easier said than done because now several countries, including the one we would be attacking, have the bomb. One thing is for sure here, if I am North Korea no way I do all this sabre rattling unless I can hit the US on the US mainland, even if it is with a suitcase nuke. In other words, if we go large, NK should immediately counter and take down a US city. If the US nukes North Korea, there won't be a North Korea left to counter. And that's what I would aim to accomplish if I'm making the decisions.
April 3, 201313 yr The fact that they're talking about using smaller bombs, does any one else feel slightly threatened that they might try to smuggle in a bomb and then detonate it? I really wouldn't be that suprised at this point. Yes I do.I do too
April 3, 201313 yr To me the million dollar questions are what is enough for the US to make a preemptive strike and if we do strike how hard do we hit them and using what weapons.? A bunker buster missile to eliminate the head of the snake and his minions. Gotta keep it conventional folks, not to will lead to a nuclear strike on our own turf. The radicals enemies would stumble over one another to "get us" if we used a nuclear solution to end the North Korean threat and we're spread to thin as it is. China knows where this clown hides and sleeps. The saber rattling will end when either him or his military henchmen are addressed. For all the unbalanced trade China reaps the benefit of, some good intel could present a welcome end. Why do you think China doesn't address this matter? What do they gain by enabling NK?
April 3, 201313 yr Another solution is sending Madonna and Rodman over with a lot of booze and drugs. They'll all be pierced, naked, playing hoops, and dancing to "celebrate" trying to mimic the 80's before you know it!
April 3, 201313 yr The fact that they're talking about using smaller bombs, does any one else feel slightly threatened that they might try to smuggle in a bomb and then detonate it? I really wouldn't be that suprised at this point. That was my first thought
April 3, 201313 yr I'm a little worried. I don't want to see a strike on US soil because I don't want any innocent lives lost because we were afraid to strike.
April 3, 201313 yr North Korea can say whatever they want. They know they will be destroyed even if they try to do the littlest thing to us.
April 3, 201313 yr My worry is that a known attack will be allowed to proceed just for political correctness sake, so we (as a country) can say we didn't strike first.
April 3, 201313 yr http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ_giRCO72E If North Korea attacks I guess they can blame it on this video...
April 4, 201313 yr Much easier said than done because now several countries, including the one we would be attacking, have the bomb. One thing is for sure here, if I am North Korea no way I do all this sabre rattling unless I can hit the US on the US mainland, even if it is with a suitcase nuke. In other words, if we go large, NK should immediately counter and take down a US city. Couldn't agree more on everything you've said here.
April 4, 201313 yr Author @KyodoNewsENG N. Korea moves apparent mid-range missile to east coast: Yonhap N. Korea moves apparent mid-range missile to east coast: Yonhap | Kyodo News
April 4, 201313 yr @KyodoNewsENG N. Korea moves apparent mid-range missile to east coast: Yonhap N. Korea moves apparent mid-range missile to east coast: Yonhap | Kyodo News I think it may be time for us to move our missiles to their basements in a violent manner.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.