1st & goal

Clay County brings Zach Lewis and their high powered offense into Pulaski County to face the maroons who are playing very well right now for a first round playoff match up. Who do you like and why?:banana:

I don't think the wet conditions favor any team more than the other.

Lets see now five plus two equals how many yards?

Harlan 35-28

GRC-35-21

Whitley 21-20

They were pretty much out of control the whole night-after the game was probably the worst part-when they refused to shake hands with Pulaski.

Look-the tape clearly shows no favortism towards either team. pulaski made the plays they had to make and so did Knox. Pulaski's coaching staff just happen to roll the dice on the two point conversion and win! Happy Halloween:scared:

Ten

Pulaski also has several injuries this year. Brian Barnett, who may be Pulaski's best defensive player has been out all year. I guess we will just have to wait until the next time they play. But until then ( Pulaski owns bragging rights!):ylsuper:

KC would have won going away? I think you are wrong on that one. As a matter of fact I think Pulaski is a better team than Knox central. Pulaski beat them last year over there and as a matter of fact I don't think Knox Central has ever won a game against Pulaski. Pulaski has just about everyone back from that team last year and so does Knox. The bottom line is the better team won last night and the refs had nothing to do with the outcome.

There was one flag on final drive and it was for a personal foul face mask. The call was correct. I do believe you are a true homer if you think you got cheated. Ask anybody that goes on your side of I-75 and see if they think they get any favorable calls!:cry:

Well I disagree with you. Pulaski made the plays down the stretch when they had to-just like Knox did on their final drive. Pulaski just happened to have the ball last and decided to go for two for the win.

The MVP was the players that made the big plays when the game was on the line!

what about him? This thread is about the game-which Pulaski won fair by beating Knox. Knox is a good team-Pulaski just happened to be better! No harm -no foul.:banana:

I believe the Knox Central sideline could take a few lessons on spotsmenship from their halftime and post game antics.

The refs had nothing to do with the outcome of the game. Knox has a good team, but so does Pulaski. Lets give credit were credit is due.:thumb:

South Laurel to rebound-38-28

A coach should not have to deal with out of control parents. If they have any credibility they would approch the coach with their problem in a civil manner and stop running around spreading rumors. One person hears something and before it has left the stadium the story takes on a new life of its own. I have no respect for people who try to tear down a coach. In 99% of all cases the coach is playing the best players. He is the one held accountable if they win or lose. I have been around coaches who could not stand the parent but played the kid anyways beacause he was the best at his position. That is what coaches do! The worst part of the whole deal is that the wife and kids are the ones who hear all the negative things about their husband and dad coming from the stands.:mad:

I over heard it at the game the other night!:sssh:

I think this will be the best team Pulaski has played since Mercer County. Should be a great game .

Mercer wins this one 35-21

Corbin 38-14

Boyle 48-14

North laurel wins 24-21