September 13, 201016 yr The Bengals need: a new coach, a new QB, a new defense and a new offensive line. Other than that, they look to be pretty tough this season. :lol: I didn't see the game, and don't really care which team won, but that is one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. :lol:
September 13, 201016 yr What's the Bengals opening day record under Marvin? 3-4. Just goes to show how overmatched Marvin is when the other coach has extra time to prepare for the Bengals.
September 13, 201016 yr The Bengals are clearly the best team in the AFC North, and that's really all that matters. They swept the division last year, and I look for them to repeat the sweep again this year.
September 14, 201016 yr The Bengals are clearly the best team in the AFC North, and that's really all that matters. They swept the division last year, and I look for them to repeat the sweep again this year. How are they "clearly" the best team in the North?
September 14, 201016 yr How are they "clearly" the best team in the North? Same question I had, I might go as far as to say they are clearly a team in the north....
September 14, 201016 yr Same question I had, I might go as far as to say they are clearly a team in the north.... :lol:
September 14, 201016 yr The Bengals on Defense has no one to bring it like Ray Lewis of Ravens does. Did you see that gave last night. He was sticking people all over the field. That makes everybody play like that. Bengals has nobody like that and that is why they come out flat and get stomped.
September 14, 201016 yr The Bengals are clearly the best team in the AFC North, and that's really all that matters. They swept the division last year, and I look for them to repeat the sweep again this year.I don't put them clearly over any team in the AFC North. Hell, at times the Browns looked scrappy---granted it was against the Bucs---so I wouldn't pencil Cincy above anyone in that division after week one.
September 14, 201016 yr Bengals lose to a very good team and coach and everyone thinks the Bengals are horrible? I don't get it. We are clearly the best team in our division and they proved that last year. Baltimore beat a Jets team last night that is mediocre at best offensively, they looked horrible on offense and only converted 1 3rd down all night. The Bengals have had lots of success against Baltimore and Palmer has played some of his best football against this team. Pittsburgh is moving backwards, and barely beat a very middle of the pack Atlanta team in OT at home. The Bengals sweep the Steelers again this season. As far as Cleveland goes, well they are Cleveland and are horrible. Kansas City will take them down this week in Cleveland. That's why I believe they are clearly the best team in the North. Bengals win their home opener, and the Jungle will be rockin.
September 14, 201016 yr Bengals lose to a very good team and coach and everyone thinks the Bengals are horrible? I don't get it. We are clearly the best team in our division and they proved that last year. Baltimore beat a Jets team last night that is mediocre at best offensively, they looked horrible on offense and only converted 1 3rd down all night. The Bengals have had lots of success against Baltimore and Palmer has played some of his best football against this team. Pittsburgh is moving backwards, and barely beat a very middle of the pack Atlanta team in OT at home. The Bengals sweep the Steelers again this season. As far as Cleveland goes, well they are Cleveland and are horrible. Kansas City will take them down this week in Cleveland. That's why I believe they are clearly the best team in the North. Bengals win their home opener, and the Jungle will be rockin. I am not saying they are horrible, but I have yet to see what distinguishes them "clearly" ahead of the rest of the division. If you are going off last season, then the Bengals looked terrible to end the season and the Ravens were playing later on than them. I still have them going far, but I am not going to dismiss what happened last week. That was simply a manhandling.
September 14, 201016 yr I don't put them clearly over any team in the AFC North. Hell, at times the Browns looked scrappy---granted it was against the Bucs---so I wouldn't pencil Cincy above anyone in that division after week one. I wouldn't pencil them in...or out, after week one. They'll play better against Baltimore in Week Two.
September 14, 201016 yr Bengals lose to a very good team and coach and everyone thinks the Bengals are horrible? I don't get it. We are clearly the best team in our division and they proved that last year. Baltimore beat a Jets team last night that is mediocre at best offensively, they looked horrible on offense and only converted 1 3rd down all night. The Bengals have had lots of success against Baltimore and Palmer has played some of his best football against this team. Pittsburgh is moving backwards, and barely beat a very middle of the pack Atlanta team in OT at home. The Bengals sweep the Steelers again this season. As far as Cleveland goes, well they are Cleveland and are horrible. Kansas City will take them down this week in Cleveland. That's why I believe they are clearly the best team in the North. Bengals win their home opener, and the Jungle will be rockin. Oh yeah that same mediocre Jets team that the Bengals lost to twice last year...the last game of the regular season and then in the playoffs at the rockin' jungle. Again if the Bengals don't win a game in the playoffs, I would oust Marvin and deal Carson to somebody out west.......
September 14, 201016 yr I am not saying they are horrible, but I have yet to see what distinguishes them "clearly" ahead of the rest of the division. If you are going off last season, then the Bengals looked terrible to end the season and the Ravens were playing later on than them. I still have them going far, but I am not going to dismiss what happened last week. That was simply a manhandling. They did look horrible at the end last year, but it was because they were a shell of the team that began the season last year. This team was decimated by injuries and had virtually nothing left to compete with in the end and the playoffs. We had basically one receiver to finish the year last season. I do agree that they got manhandled last week, and that's why I expect to see a different team when they kickoff on Sunday against the Ravens. This week should tell alot about this year's team. The barometer is set.
September 14, 201016 yr I put the Ravens ahead of the Bengals. With the additions of 81 and 84, they are improved offensively over last season. They still look pretty good on D. We'll find out Sunday.
September 14, 201016 yr Oh yeah that same mediocre Jets team that the Bengals lost to twice last year...the last game of the regular season and then in the playoffs at the rockin' jungle. Again if the Bengals don't win a game in the playoffs, I would oust Marvin and deal Carson to somebody out west....... Are you seriously going to include the last regular season game? Bengals had already clinched, and gave this game away. Everyone knows that. Like I said previously, the Bengals were crippled by injuries and were a shell of the team that began the season vs. the one that limped into the playoffs. Let's not hit the panic buttons after week 1.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.