November 17, 201015 yr None of which have the slightest to do with TO. Oh I know it's everybody else's fault.
November 17, 201015 yr Oh I know it's everybody else's fault. What exactly has TO done that has caused this team to be 2-7? Aside from being the # 3 WR in Yards, top 5 in TDs and top 5 in catches? They have a ton of issues, TO is way way way down the list.
November 17, 201015 yr Author I think we should start a count down to the implosion... :lol: Boom goes the dynomite! :lol:
November 17, 201015 yr TO has been good on the field for the most part but he has some blame in all of this as well.
November 17, 201015 yr Author TO has been good on the field for the most part but he has some blame in all of this as well. I think TO has been good on the field as well, but I said on another thread that I didn't think Ocho and TO could exist on the same team. Both want to be the man, and TO is clearly better than Cinco. IMO
November 17, 201015 yr TO has been good on the field for the most part but he has some blame in all of this as well. I think indirectly some blame can be aimed at Owens. Not because he has been disruptive, but from the perspective if he is on the field, Carson - who I do not believe is much of a leader - will defer to a guy like Owens and feels he has to force feed him the ball. Owens has been the targets of more passes than anyone in the NFL. It is plausible to say that has been disruptive to the Benglas offensive cohesion.
November 18, 201015 yr I went back through this thread and I took alot of crap for saying this was a terrible idea. I think one of my post was referred to as "exhibit a" of someone who doesn't know anything about football. I will say that Owens has been more productive than I thought but the effect is just what I expected. Losers are losers.
November 18, 201015 yr I guess the Defense is just shutting everyone down...... T.O Cant catch a cold.
November 18, 201015 yr I went back through this thread and I took alot of crap for saying this was a terrible idea. I think one of my post was referred to as "exhibit a" of someone who doesn't know anything about football. I will say that Owens has been more productive than I thought but the effect is just what I expected. Losers are losers. It's hasn't been a terrible idea.
November 19, 201015 yr I guess if you don't count wins and loses. So you really believe that if TO, the only player on the Bengals having an even decent year, wasn't on the team they'd be winning? You really believe that? Bartender, I'll have what that guys having. :lol:
November 19, 201015 yr So you really believe that if TO, the only player on the Bengals having an even decent year, wasn't on the team they'd be winning? You really believe that? Bartender, I'll have what that guys having. :lol: I have no idea I could speculate but I don't have to speculate about one thing. He is on the team and they are not winning.
November 19, 201015 yr I have no idea I could speculate but I don't have to speculate about one thing. He is on the team and they are not winning. You are speculating though. You're speculating that he's the reason, which couldn't be further from the truth.
November 19, 201015 yr I went back through this thread and I took alot of crap for saying this was a terrible idea. I think one of my post was referred to as "exhibit a" of someone who doesn't know anything about football. I will say that Owens has been more productive than I thought but the effect is just what I expected. Losers are losers. The Gals were losers well before TO arrived. He's the best football player on the entire team. Need to take a look at the other 50 or so guys. your philosophy would quantify them all as losers. And that might be the case.
November 19, 201015 yr You are speculating though. You're speculating that he's the reason, which couldn't be further from the truth. I am not speculating. The Bengals went to the playoffs last year by running the ball. This year they are trying to keep the enormous egos happy by throwing the ball.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.