March 15, 201016 yr Curious why the strongest #2 (WVU) didn't end up in the region with the weakest #1, as it's supposed to happen? The two "top" #1 seeds, got the best # 2 seeds. I don't think the committee took any of that into consideration.
March 15, 201016 yr Author The two "top" #1 seeds, got the best # 2 seeds. I don't think the committee took any of that into consideration. Then why have an overall #1? This is the worst overall bracket EVER.............
March 15, 201016 yr Then why have an overall #1? This is the worst overall bracket EVER............. :idunno:
March 15, 201016 yr Then why have an overall #1? This is the worst overall bracket EVER............. I agree with that. If you're going to award someone with a #1 overall seed then give them the easiest road period. They've earned it.
March 15, 201016 yr One has to be blind to not see that Duke got the easiest road on paper. While I'm not happy about UK's draw, I'd be irate if I were a Kansas fan--Ohio State, Georgetown, Maryland, & Michigan State? How is that considered a reward? How do the top 2 #1 seeds get paired with the top 2 #2 seeds?
March 15, 201016 yr IFFFFF UK and DUKE meet in the final 4 could make for some great post game chatter.
March 15, 201016 yr Duke may win the whole thing but for some reason they still don't impress me that much. I think UL beats them in round two.
March 15, 201016 yr Like that'll happen. I was wondering when this thread was going to pop up. It makes for good discussion and rightfully so. There is a reason every analyst is questioning this bracket. Nova was pretty bad down the stretch and not the same team as last year. Baylor and Purdue as a 3 and 4? A legit argument can be made that in the South, seeds 1-5 are all the weakest 1-5s of all regions.
March 15, 201016 yr I think Louisville can beat Duke. I think Louisville may be the second best team in the entire South bracket. If they can get to the Sweet 16, I could see them making the Final 4. The South bracket has to have the least amount of elite NBA type talent in it than any bracket ever assembled.:confused:
March 15, 201016 yr One has to be blind to not see that Duke got the easiest road on paper. While I'm not happy about UK's draw, I'd be irate if I were a Kansas fan--Ohio State, Georgetown, Maryland, & Michigan State? How is that considered a reward? How do the top 2 #1 seeds get paired with the top 2 #2 seeds? You forgot about one of the only 2 teams to beat the Jayhawks in UT as well....How they got a 6 seed is beyond me....
March 15, 201016 yr Check out what Chad Ford has to say about the brackets..... http://twitter.com/chadfordinsider
March 15, 201016 yr It makes for good discussion and rightfully so. There is a reason every analyst is questioning this bracket. Nova was pretty bad down the stretch and not the same team as last year. Baylor and Purdue as a 3 and 4? A legit argument can be made that in the South, seeds 1-5 are all the weakest 1-5s of all regions. Personally I would have minimal complaints about the brackets if they simply swapped G'town and Nova...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.