Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Interesting BCS Stat

Featured Replies

Each of the 6 computer formulas used are different. Do some of your own homework and look them up... :D

 

I was hoping you would provide a link :lol:

  • Replies 31
  • Views 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Sagarin had UC 6th in their computer rankings with a slightly better SOS then TCU and Boise State.

Actually Oregon is ahead of them in his overall ratings.

The BCS uses his ELO-Chess formula which has UC 3rd.

 

Is the poll voting hurting UC in some form?

Its unlikely they get a shot at the title game anyway, is it the possibility they miss the Sugar Bowl the argument?

  • Author
I'm not sure I'm following you here. Are you saying that Big 10 coaches are voting higher for their teams than they should? How many Big 10 coaches vote in the coaches poll? How many Big East coaches?

 

I'm saying the votes with a guaranteed spot (Big 11, SEC, ACC, Big 12, Pac 10) are going to do all they can to protect the $$$ as best as they can. That, to the core, is the flaw in the system, and from top to bottom is what prevents a playoff.

 

It's a lot like breaking down who gets into the field of 64 in hoops and how they get seeded once you examine who is in the selection room that year...

  • Author

Its unlikely they get a shot at the title game anyway, is it the possibility they miss the Sugar Bowl the argument?

 

The argument is if UC drops the game at Pitt they are an afterthought in the process, and will not get a BCS game while a clearly inferior Big 11 team will get in because the system allows it...

It doesnt take your love for UC , GT, to tell me its a bad system. Ive hated it from day 1!

The argument is if UC drops the game at Pitt they are an afterthought in the process, and will not get a BCS game while a clearly inferior Big 11 team will get in because the system allows it...

 

I don't think there are any Iowa fans on here it's ok to say it. :lol: UC controls it's own destiny.

I'm not sure I'm following you here. Are you saying that Big 10 coaches are voting higher for their teams than they should? How many Big 10 coaches vote in the coaches poll? How many Big East coaches?
6 Big 10 coaches 4 Big East.

 

Rich Rodriguez, Michigan

Ron Zook, Illinois

Bill Lynch, Indiana

Jim Tressel, Ohio State

Tim Brewster, Minnesota

Mark Dantonio, Michigan State

 

Greg Schiano, Rutgers

Brian Kelly, Cincinnati

Steve Kragthorpe, Louisville

Jim Leavitt, South Florida

The first place Big Ten team (OSU) lost at home to the current tied for 3rd Pac 10 team. The current first place BE team (UC) won on the road at the current 2nd place Pac 10 team.

 

But I thought UC winning at Oregon St wasn't a big win. At least that's what people on here said. IF and it's a big IF, but if they win the Pac 10 would that qualify it as a big win?

The argument is if UC drops the game at Pitt they are an afterthought in the process, and will not get a BCS game while a clearly inferior Big 11 team will get in because the system allows it...

 

A loss to to Pitt will cost UC a BCS bowl game because of their inability to fill seats and the limited TV draw. It has nothing to do with where they are ranked, strength of schedule, etc.

A loss to to Pitt will cost UC a BCS bowl game because of their inability to fill seats and the limited TV draw. It has nothing to do with where they are ranked, strength of schedule, etc.

 

$$$$$

 

Didn't UC sell all of their tickets last year?

UC will not lose to Pitt. Its not going to matter.

The argument is if UC drops the game at Pitt they are an afterthought in the process, and will not get a BCS game while a clearly inferior Big 11 team will get in because the system allows it...

 

UC should be in a BCS GAME regardless of the Pitt game result.

  • Author
$$$$$

 

Didn't UC sell all of their tickets last year?

UC took about 18K to Miami last year. It was at least 2 to 1 UC to VT fans...

UC should be in a BCS GAME regardless of the Pitt game result.

 

Well Ok St lost their play in game by 4 TD's so now it will probably be Iowa.

 

Texas litterally has the worst resume I can remember for a team in the title game and LSU lost 2 games a couple years ago.

I actually believe that UC should be in as well...win or lose....I just don't think that it is going to happen, thought OK St. losing sure helped.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.