Remember Miss California who stood up for traditional marriage and got 15 minutes plus of fame? Fame is not always good.

 

Apparently young Miss CA took some risque photos as a 17 year old and now they are surfacing. As Gomer said "Surprise surprise surprise."

delete

A mistake is a mistake. No surprise that someone tracked this down though.

Uhh, anybody got a link?

 

Is there a drooling smilie? :lol:

A mistake is a mistake. No surprise that someone tracked this down though.

 

 

I'm not certain it was a mistake. The picture that I saw looked like it would not have been out-of-place in the lingerie section of a JCPenney catalog. That's hardly something a model should consider shameful. Perhaps more revealing photos will surface. Until then it seems to be much ado about nothing.

Or perhaps, just perhaps it's more in the pattern of harrasment this woman has faced from leftys since she had the audacity to eschew political correctness and respectfully express her true beliefs.

I checked the picture in question out and I see nothing wrong with it at all. Anyone outside of Perez Hilton that would try to make this an issue is reaching, IMO.

Where can you find it?

Or perhaps, just perhaps it's more in the pattern of harrasment this woman has faced from leftys since she had the audacity to eschew political correctness and respectfully express her true beliefs.

 

I think you hit the

 

on the

.

 

She's a now a

.

Where can you find it?

 

Google images...

I checked the picture in question out and I see nothing wrong with it at all. Anyone outside of Perez Hilton that would try to make this an issue is reaching, IMO.

 

Agreed...

Not sure if I want to see it, if she was only 17 years old when it was taken. Is it that bad?

Not sure if I want to see it, if she was only 17 years old when it was taken. Is it that bad?

 

It honestly is not bad at all. Its just been blown completely out of proportion. Just google for images of 2009 Miss California and you'll see it rather quickly. It really isn't that bad...

I'm not certain it was a mistake. The picture that I saw looked like it would not have been out-of-place in the lingerie section of a JCPenney catalog. That's hardly something a model should consider shameful. Perhaps more revealing photos will surface. Until then it seems to be much ado about nothing.

 

I had the same reaction to the photo I saw. I hardly call that photo risque. And I agree that unless and until more revealing photos surface, it is much ado about nothing and probably nothing other than an attempt by those that disagree with her position on gay marriage to attack her. Which is sadly no "surprise, surprise, surprise" and more garbage and evidence of what this country has sadly sunken into. :irked:

Supposedly the Miss California people released this photo to an outfit called "dirty.com", and also violated the law by revealing protected medical information that they had payed for Miss California to have breast implants. It is a total smear campaign orchestrated by the gay agenda. I have seen the photo, it is modeling pink half-brief underwear with her bare upper torso turned away from the camera and covered by her arms.

 

Carrie Prejean is going to cash in on this, and so would I. She has already been paid to be spokesperson for a national advertising campaign sponsored by the National Marriage Coalition, and also is going to be a Washington liason for a right to life group opposed to stem-cell research. I hope she makes millions.