16thBBall Fan Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 Looks like Whitefield bounced back after yesterdays loss to Elliott by 61 with a 64 point win over Riverside.
ky hoopster Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 I guess its OK for them but not Elliott!!!!!!!!!!
polarbear1994 Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 I guess its OK for them but not Elliott!!!!!!!!!! Yeah, I was thinking the same thing!
Mack The Knife Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 I guess its OK for them but not Elliott!!!!!!!!!! Touche!:clap:
JPP Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 I dont believe it was the Whitefield fans complaining. It seems that some follow Elliott to chime in any time they can twist a story.
mcpapa Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 All right, I want to know right now. I want to know how many minutes the starters played, I want to know how minutes the reserves played, I want to know if the starters played the third quarter, I want to know... Never mind. Congratulations to Whitefield on bouncing back from what I had thought (obviously in error) was a devastating experience from which no mortal could recover.:thumb:
Wireman Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 All right, I want to know right now. I want to know how many minutes the starters played, I want to know how minutes the reserves played, I want to know if the starters played the third quarter, I want to know... Never mind. Congratulations to Whitefield on bouncing back from what I had thought (obviously in error) was a devastating experience from which no mortal could recover.:thumb: I agree. Did their coach have a starter playing in the 4th? :lol:
16thBBall Fan Posted February 1, 2009 Author Posted February 1, 2009 All right, I want to know right now. I want to know how many minutes the starters played, I want to know how minutes the reserves played, I want to know if the starters played the third quarter, I want to know... Never mind. Congratulations to Whitefield on bouncing back from what I had thought (obviously in error) was a devastating experience from which no mortal could recover.:thumb: I agree if they had starters play 18 min. or more and up to 24 min. like was done to them only 24 hours ago then to that is not good either and if so I hope no one from Whitefield complained on Friday night.
addout Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 All right, I want to know right now. I want to know how many minutes the starters played, I want to know how minutes the reserves played, I want to know if the starters played the third quarter, I want to know... Never mind. Congratulations to Whitefield on bouncing back from what I had thought (obviously in error) was a devastating experience from which no mortal could recover.:thumb: Unlike most adults, aren't kids amazing they take a licking and just keep on ticking. We worry about playing time or are the starters in the game after one team gets a big lead and the kids just, well they just move on!
SportsGuy41017 Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 I dont believe it was the Whitefield fans complaining. It seems that some follow Elliott to chime in any time they can twist a story. I can't highlight anything here, as you hit the nail on the head in the whole post! It's not the parents or fans of a losing team complaining, it's people that have a grudge against a them that look and anything and everything to pick at.
Recommended Posts