September 7, 200719 yr That was much more entertaining than expected! Should be a fun one next week:)
September 7, 200719 yr I would hate to play D for UofL right now. Tomorrow's films are going to be brutal, and then one extra day of practice next week. They are going to be hating life. However, they got their manhood tested, passed the multiple choice and essay section, and are good to go. I think that this was a major wake-up for the UofL D. I look for them to be much improved come Saturday. Still hope that they lose.
September 7, 200719 yr Author I would hate to play D for UofL right now. Tomorrow's films are going to be brutal, and then one extra day of practice next week. They are going to be hating life. However, they got their manhood tested, passed the multiple choice and essay section, and are good to go. I think that this was a major wake-up for the UofL D. I look for them to be much improved come Saturday. Still hope that they lose. Can you really improve that much in a week though?
September 7, 200719 yr I'll start with the good. Their offensive was outstanding. UL has so many weapons to use. Of course Brohm is a Heisman candidate, he had a great game. And the offensive line was amazing. It was like a game of 2 hand touch on most throws where you can't rush until a thousand and five. And UL has a great finisher with their field goal kicker. Their defense, well it looked like the old Hal Mumme I'll try to out score you teams. Before MTSU wore down some they were shredding the UL defense. Also, Im sure UL made some adjustments. Obviously a huge question mark until atleast next Saturday.
September 7, 200719 yr I can't remember the last time UofL's defense left me speechless.2003 Miami (Oh) We looked like a John L Smith team out there. The penalties and the lack of defense were disturbing. They better get this straightened out by next week.
September 7, 200719 yr Brohm last 2 games... 41/61 772 yards 9 TD's 0 INT's 20 straight wins at Papa Johns
September 7, 200719 yr Author So is there anyone who thinks UofL's D can play this way next weekend, and them not lose?
September 7, 200719 yr Louisville... 725 Total Yards 397 Passing Yards (I believe) 328 Rushing Yards 33 First Downs
September 7, 200719 yr Let's see. 1,277 total yards. 723 by UL and 554 by MTSU. 264 rushing yards by MTSU. 324 by UL. UL ran 91 plays, averaged 7.9 yards a play MTSU only ran 55 plays. Averaged 10.0 yards a play. Can you remember a college team average 10 yards a play and still lose? MTSU four turnovers to one for UL. UL 9 flags for 92 yards. Brohm was 25/39 for 399 yards and 5 TDs. Craddock threw for 290. Contrary to what people thought coming in, there wasn't a Hunter Cantwell sighting. Anthony Allen 34 carries for 271 yards. Tanner had 144 yards for MTSU on 9 carries Here is what has to worry UK next week. Mario Urrutia 7 catches for 139 yards and 2 TDs. Gary Barnidge four catches for 126 yards and two scores. Harry Douglas eight catches, 100 yards and a score. Who do you stop?
September 7, 200719 yr If they play this way next week they lose. I mean all I see on the UK threads from the 'Ville is how poor the UK defense. Well.......it isn't that bad
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.