February 14, 200719 yr Then I guess your Top 3 aren't capable of taking your team to the FF? :sssh: :walk: That's a large leap to get to that conclusion.
February 14, 200719 yr This thread is a lot like the old days. I'm shocked... As in before the term "Tubby Basher" became popular lingo on BGP??
February 14, 200719 yr I understand where you're going with this, and I'm not saying that I necessarily disagree (because for some reason I agree with you guys more often than not..) but Bradley was on fire when he sat with his 4th foul. If he didn't have to sit, I think he would've finished with at least 20. Of course that's just hypothetical... He sat, and scored 14. :irked: You act like that's a bad thing...:lol: Foul trouble is part of the game...If someone says their Top 3 need to play well to get them to the FF, that means staying out of foul trouble...The "Oh-Fers" should know that by now...
February 14, 200719 yr That's a large leap to get to that conclusion. Not when considering the statement Im arguing...
February 14, 200719 yr This thread is a lot like the old days. I'm shocked... So are you going to post about the game or just post about the posts?
February 14, 200719 yr I didn't see the effort necessary to win tonight. Too many UK players don't have the fire in their bellies (or sometimes the brains in their heads, either). Losing seems to have become acceptable. I would love to see UK get a motivated big man for a change.
February 14, 200719 yr :irked: You act like that's a bad thing...:lol: Foul trouble is part of the game...If someone says their Top 3 need to play well to get them to the FF, that means staying out of foul trouble...The "Oh-Fers" should know that by now... Indeed it is, but when is the last time Bradley fouled out? Morris maybe... If you're not going to guard the interior anyways, might as well not have a big man that you aren't going to pass much to anyways. You should know me well enough by now to know that I don't make excuses for losses. Just simply saying that it's not something I expect to happen again. Bradley's a pretty smart defender and doesn't normally pick up that many fouls. To your point about agreeing with you, you must be right because I'm never wrong.
February 14, 200719 yr ^ Hangover effect...exactly what I brought up regarding Duke -vs- Maryland after Carolina
February 14, 200719 yr Not when considering the statement Im arguing... Well then, in regards to the statement you're arguing, I would consider two of the best players not throwing the game away as part of showing up. Points don't mean everything.
February 14, 200719 yr So are you going to post about the game or just post about the posts? What would you like to hear from me more than what I've said. UK is an inconsistent team on both ends of the floor. Sometimes they are fantastic on one and awful on the other. Sometimes it's the opposite. When it's both it last for 15 or so minutes and is soon followed by 15 minutes of :sleep: at the wheel. The talent is there. The consistency isn't. I can post it four or five more times if you'd like...
February 14, 200719 yr UK shot 56% from the field, but UT took 12 more shots than UK. UK outrebounded UT by 12. UK made one more foul shot than UT. Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers!!!!! UK 19, UT 8
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.