Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Scottie Scheffler Arrested at PGA

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, TheDeuce said:

I would almost guarantee that doesn't happen, but we'll see. 

Which part?

  • Replies 254
  • Views 20.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TheDeuce
    TheDeuce

  • Bluegrasscard
    Bluegrasscard

    Here is some Zapruder-like fodder.  The 4 minute Pole video and the 55 minute dashcam video synch up at around 0:27 seconds and 22:47.  You can not see much in either until Scheffler's vehicle co

  • Not to make light of a tragic situation, but if Sheffler showed up to the 1st tee box in his orange jumpsuit that would have broken the universe.

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, theguru said:

Which part?

Scheffler paying anything. 

The County Attorney looks pretty silly in this video, IMO. 

19 minutes ago, TheDeuce said:

The County Attorney looks pretty silly in this video, IMO. 

It looked like a normal court hearing to me. 

19 minutes ago, theguru said:

It looked like a normal court hearing to me. 

He's making an argument about not treating Scheffler different while actively trying to treat him different by not wanting the arraignment moved. 

38 minutes ago, TheDeuce said:

The County Attorney looks pretty silly in this video, IMO. 

Unless Jefferson County does things differently from the rest of the state (which wouldn't shock me), it was probably the Commonwealth Attorney that was involved in that hearing. 

1 minute ago, sportsfan41 said:

Unless Jefferson County does things differently from the rest of the state (which wouldn't shock me), it was probably the Commonwealth Attorney that was involved in that hearing. 

Could be, I'm not sure on that. 

Just now, TheDeuce said:

He's making an argument about not treating Scheffler different while actively trying to treat him different by not wanting the arraignment moved. 

The arraignment isn't moved too often, without it already being agreed upon by the prosecution and the defense, even then it's pretty rare. Now people may waive their preliminary hearing (not the same as arraignment) or ask for it to be continued to a later date for various reasons. I've definitely seen that done as a more common practice. 

2 minutes ago, TheDeuce said:

He's making an argument about not treating Scheffler different while actively trying to treat him different by not wanting the arraignment moved. 

Let's face it, they are already treating him different.  They let him out on OR and now they pushed his arraignment back until June.  Considering the nature/type of charge, this is probably the only time in the history of Jefferson County that those two things have happened.  Sure it happens all the time for much lesser charges and such but not in situations like this.  

Plus as sf41 alluded to, the Commonwealth Attorney of Jefferson County is probably involved in this.  All eyes are on this case and it is one of those cases that could severely alienate and damage the relationship between the Commonwealth Attorney and every law enforcement official in Jefferson County.  And on that point, forget Scheffler, (because we know not much if anything is going to happen to him) no citizen of Jefferson County wants that type of division.  It is horrible for the city of Louisville/Jefferson County if this is not handled properly by the Commonwealth Attorney. 

3 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Who will get more preferential treatment: Scheffler or the police officer?

What are you suggesting with the police officer? 

With Scheffler, like I mentioned in my last post, my guess is he is getting the greatest preferential treatment of all time. 

25 minutes ago, sportsfan41 said:

The arraignment isn't moved too often, without it already being agreed upon by the prosecution and the defense, even then it's pretty rare. Now people may waive their preliminary hearing (not the same as arraignment) or ask for it to be continued to a later date for various reasons. I've definitely seen that done as a more common practice. 

The original date/time was set without input from Scheffler's counsel. That is the reason for the move from what I can gather. 

16 minutes ago, theguru said:

Let's face it, they are already treating him different.  They let him out on OR and now they pushed his arraignment back until June.  Considering the nature/type of charge, this is probably the only time in the history of Jefferson County that those two things have happened.  Sure it happens all the time for much lesser charges and such but not in situations like this.  

Plus as sf41 alluded to, the Commonwealth Attorney of Jefferson County is probably involved in this.  All eyes are on this case and it is one of those cases that could severely alienate and damage the relationship between the Commonwealth Attorney and every law enforcement official in Jefferson County.  And on that point, forget Scheffler, (because we know not much if anything is going to happen to him) no citizen of Jefferson County wants that type of division.  It is horrible for the city of Louisville/Jefferson County if this is not handled properly by the Commonwealth Attorney. 

How, in your opinion, should it be handled differently than it has to this point?

Just now, TheDeuce said:

The original date/time was set without input from Scheffler's counsel. That is the reason for the move from what I can gather. 

Assuming that is true (and I am not arguing the point) that would be standard operating procedure because in almost all cases the alleged perpetrator would be sitting in jail so the system is required to give the perp a quick arraignment. 

3 minutes ago, TheDeuce said:

How, in your opinion, should it be handled differently than it has to this point?

First or all, he should not have been let out on his own with no bond.  I know it would not be any issue for Scheffler to post a bond but that is not the point.  The point is you want blind justice/equal treatment and if celebs/rich/famous get preferential treatment then justice certainly isn't blind.  Now, once they let him out with no bond that put us down the rabbit hole.  Fast forward to today, normally the perp would be sitting in court in his orange jump suit and then court would have been much different today.  But since they already gave Scheffler preferential treatment, the prosecution was between a rock and a hard place today.  If they just agree to the continuance it would be considered more preferential treatment by many so the prosecution had to object even though they knew they would be overruled by the Judge. 

With all that said, I am glad it was continued so the dust can settle and all sides can take a hard look at all the facts and come up with a resolution. 

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.