November 10, 200619 yr After the field goal I had this crazy though that this may happen!! http://youtube.com/watch?v=Gp5WM94UOBg I had the same thought, wonder why they didn't? And to kick to Spillman?:confused:
November 10, 200619 yr Right... At any rate, if OSU/UM matchup occurs in the National Title game, I don't see the BCS surviving much longer.
November 10, 200619 yr Author Why does everyone think Louisville would have been in the national title game if they went undefeated but not Rutgers? Why the double standard? If Rutgers went undefeated wouldn't it be just like Louisville doing it. I think that because that's the rules of the system. Like it or not Rutgers has no chance. And as a UM fan, that makes me a little warm and fuzzy... :lol:
November 10, 200619 yr Author At any rate, if OSU/UM matchup occurs in the National Title game, I don't see the BCS surviving much longer. God forbid the best two teams play for it... :sssh:
November 10, 200619 yr Why does everyone think Louisville would have been in the national title game if they went undefeated but not Rutgers? Why the double standard? If Rutgers went undefeated wouldn't it be just like Louisville doing it. Only difference is the lower ranking to start the season.... Somewhat similar to Auburn a few years ago.
November 10, 200619 yr If you're talking about yourself... you've flip flopped since then right? After losing the Presidential election John Kerry has had plenty of time to make 43,000+ post. :laugh: Got to give GT some credit though, he had been calling for SUNJ over UL for a long time now (at least prior to the flip flop)
November 10, 200619 yr What year? I don't remember anyone other than Mich. being champions that year? Never happened.............. Tom Osborne retirement party..........:madman: USC & LSU ring a bell? USC ranked #1 and left out, LSU wins the BCS championship from the coaches and USC wins the AP? That's the exact scenario you could still see that would provide a split championship. It doesn't matter what the BCS does, the AP still award their own.
November 10, 200619 yr I think that because that's the rules of the system. Like it or not Rutgers has no chance. And as a UM fan, that makes me a little warm and fuzzy... :lol: Honestly, why is Rutgers any different than UL?
November 10, 200619 yr I think that because that's the rules of the system. Like it or not Rutgers has no chance. And as a UM fan, that makes me a little warm and fuzzy... :lol: :thumb: :thumb:
November 10, 200619 yr I had the same thought, wonder why they didn't? And to kick to Spillman?:confused: I would have never kicked to him again. They apparently weren't thinking clearly!!
November 10, 200619 yr Author After losing the Presidential election John Kerry has had plenty of time to make 43,000+ post. :laugh: Got to give GT some credit though, he had been calling for SUNJ over UL for a long time now (at least prior to the flip flop) I out thought myself on this one... :lol:
November 10, 200619 yr Honestly, why is Rutgers any different than UL? They shouldn't be. But they are, at least in the pollster's eyes.
November 10, 200619 yr I'm not saying it shouldn't happen, GT, actually that is what the BCS was made to do, right? But there will simply be so much whining and pestering by all the one loss teams and the non-BCS conferences, the BCS simply will not stand.
November 10, 200619 yr Petrino needs to get Spillman involved in the offense. The guy can flat out fly and is a playmaker.
November 10, 200619 yr Author Honestly, why is Rutgers any different than UL? Because the human polls see them that way. It's well known I've been touting how good Rutgers has played this year, and they should have their shot. But I can't see it going down...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.