April 4, 20179 yr Here is Fox News going after the others. So much for the liberal media being fair and balanced. I wish Trump would meet and fix the problem with the CEOs of the liberals media and get America back to trust.
April 4, 20179 yr If anyone disagrees with the following givens please jump in. It seems like these are facts that are simply indisputable: Rice was NSA In her role she saw intel daily. In her role she often asked for the unmasking of a US citizen or "USP." She cannot unilaterally unmask a USP. There is a two-prong test that has to be met before the intel org who did the surveillance "unmasks" a USP. Step 1: Is there a valid "need to know?" Step 2: Is the identification of USP truly necessary to understand contest of the intel? Once the request has been granted Rice has a limited number of people she can share the ID with - only those with proper security clearance. "Unmasking" does not mean "leaking." Unmasking simply means those with proper security clearance can know the name of the USP. The requests are logged and available to Congress. Congress often requests intel agencies to provide the log. President Trump and his team have had this list of not only requests for unmasking but also those requests that were granted at their disposal from Day 1. These requests cannot be hidden. So with all of the above givens what is the real issue here?
April 4, 20179 yr The leaking of names to the press... Ok but nothing in the stories we've read has said anything about her leaking names to the press, has it?
April 4, 20179 yr The leaking of names to the press... Didn't Trump leak information himself to Tucker Carlson? I believe he even admitted he did it when he was on Carlson's show.
April 4, 20179 yr CNN has their collective knickers is a twist because Trump had the audacity to publicly call them out. It's a vendetta for them now. I definitely agree with this.
April 4, 20179 yr Here is Fox News going after the others. Doesn't the nightly news do actual reporting of facts and not engage in the editorial style of journalism like the cable news companies do?
April 4, 20179 yr Here is Fox News going after the others. The first one (abc) makes sense since that is where Rice's husband is an executive producer. If abc got leaked information it would not have had far to travel.
April 4, 20179 yr I still say put the following on tiral for treason and send to prison or the elect chair. Bush Both Clinton's Obama McConnell Reid Pelosi Susan Rice Eric Holder L. Lynch Aberdeen V Jarrett
April 4, 20179 yr Author If anyone disagrees with the following givens please jump in. It seems like these are facts that are simply indisputable: Rice was NSA In her role she saw intel daily. In her role she often asked for the unmasking of a US citizen or "USP." She cannot unilaterally unmask a USP. There is a two-prong test that has to be met before the intel org who did the surveillance "unmasks" a USP. Step 1: Is there a valid "need to know?" Step 2: Is the identification of USP truly necessary to understand contest of the intel? Once the request has been granted Rice has a limited number of people she can share the ID with - only those with proper security clearance. "Unmasking" does not mean "leaking." Unmasking simply means those with proper security clearance can know the name of the USP. The requests are logged and available to Congress. Congress often requests intel agencies to provide the log. President Trump and his team have had this list of not only requests for unmasking but also those requests that were granted at their disposal from Day 1. These requests cannot be hidden. So with all of the above givens what is the real issue here? Why Susan Rice’s Reported ‘Unmasking’ of Trump Officials Raises Very Serious Legal Concerns for Her | Law News I posted this article again for you since you didn't read it and it's obvious that was copied from somewhere. Also a few more points 1. Rice interest in the Trump team and their unmasking increased right after Trump nomination . Why? 2. It can't be tied directly to Rice yet but those same reports she unmasked had their classification changed inside the adminstration to make it easier to be passed along to departments. In turn made it easier to leak. 3. Susan Rice was on PBS a few weeks ago and said she had no knowledge of any of this. A blatant lie. Now she is just saying she didn't leak anything and everything was legal. But she now admits to unmasking. So why should I now believe her ?
April 5, 20179 yr Why Susan Rice’s Reported ‘Unmasking’ of Trump Officials Raises Very Serious Legal Concerns for Her | Law News I posted this article again for you since you didn't read it and it's obvious that was copied from somewhere. Also a few more points 1. Rice interest in the Trump team and their unmasking increased right after Trump nomination . Why? 2. It can't be tied directly to Rice yet but those same reports she unmasked had their classification changed inside the adminstration to make it easier to be passed along to departments. In turn made it easier to leak. 3. Susan Rice was on PBS a few weeks ago and said she had no knowledge of any of this. A blatant lie. Now she is just saying she didn't leak anything and everything was legal. But she now admits to unmasking. So why should I now believe her ? Before I respond are you saying I copied my post from someone?
April 5, 20179 yr Author Before I respond are you saying I copied my post from someone? Not word for word but a similar argument is being made across liberal twitter today. Again the theme of your post is essentially what is the big deal. When there are legitmate concerns and repeated lies from Susan Rice on matters of national security. She changes he story as more information comes forward. This is a non issue to you. But I'm guessing you support the notion the Russians hacked the election but we haven't seen a single piece of evidence to show it.
April 5, 20179 yr Doesn't the nightly news do actual reporting of facts and not engage in the editorial style of journalism like the cable news companies do? This is a legitimate news story no matter how much everyone on the left wishes it wasn't.
April 5, 20179 yr Before I respond are you saying I copied my post from someone? I have also seen the same thought process across the twitter world today. Not saying you did that, and I dont guess plagiarism is a rule violation here on BGP.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.