November 20, 20169 yr Serious question here... A few Trumpsters said that a third party vote was a wasted vote when anti-Trumpsters said they wouldn't vote for Hillary, but rather a third party. In your opinion, in regards to this article, what's the difference between a "wasted" third party vote and not voting at all? Who someone voted for doesn't matter to me. The problem I see is the article points out the majority of those arrested during the riots didn't vote at all. Why are they protesting the election results when they didn't even bother voting in the first place. It would be like having a choice of Steak or Fish at a wedding reception and you were given the choice but not choosing one and being upset when you were served fish instead of steak.
November 20, 20169 yr Attorney: ‘Hamilton’ Casting Call Violates City Human Rights Law Libs at work .
November 20, 20169 yr Attorney: ‘Hamilton’ Casting Call Violates City Human Rights Law Libs at work . 100 years ago William Howard Taft opened a women's shelter in Cincinnati called the Anna Louise Inn named after his daughter intended to be safe low income housing for battered and abused women needing a safe haven, and a place to help them get back on their feet. The ALI is located across the street from the Taft Museum which was once the home of W.H. Taft and has operated non stop all of these years for its intended purpose. The powerfully wealthy Western and Southern Life Insurance Company whose headquarters are located on the east side of downtown Cincinnati, and have for a number of years have had their sites set on numerous historical buildings in the surrounding areas for various financial endeavors wanted to secure the Anna Louise Inn to turn it into a boutique hotel. The Anna Louise had no plans to halt its services, and the building was not on the market for sale. W&S Life Ins however wanted this building no, ifs, and or buts, so to make life rough for them began filing complaints that the building needed repairs and was not up to code and ultimately took the ALI to court in a battle to try to make them surrender the property because W&S Life Ins wanted it. Trial after trial went in favor of the Anna Louis Inn, so when W&S Life Ins was out of legal options as to how they could gain ownership of this building their lawyers reached into their bag of tricks and sued the Anna Louise Inn for discriminating against men because the operation was intended solely for women. They won and forced the Anna Louise to move its operation elsewhere (still a shelter for women), and they secured the property and it is now in the process of being converted into a boutique hotel. Sitting directly next to the W&S Life Ins headquarters in a historical building that houses the Cincinnati Literary Club that has been in operation since 1849 that limits its membership to 100 wealthy men. The reason that I draw attention to this story is because just as pathetic a ridiculous unethical loophole as I'm sure most can see regarding how W&S drove out the owners of the Anna Louise for their personal gain, this article is just as ridiculous in trying to find a loophole regarding the so called unfair casting of Hamilton.
November 20, 20169 yr You cant have it both ways. Just saying. Thats what drove alot to vote Trump is what several people and lifelong Democrats have told me. Not only was Hillary crooked the entire left is becoming that way. Cry for inclusion and this? What if a group of white people had done this? I can see it now. :lol2:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.