June 13, 201610 yr I teach the Constitution for a living. I revere the document when it is used to further social justice and make our country a more inclusive one. I admire the Founders for establishing a representative democracy that has survived for over two centuries. But sometimes we just have to acknowledge that the Founders and the Constitution are wrong. This is one of those times. We need to say loud and clear: The Second Amendment must be repealed. As much as we have a culture of reverence for the founding generation, it's important to understand that they got it wrong — and got it wrong often. Unfortunately, in many instances, they enshrined those faults in the Constitution. For instance, most people don't know it now, but under the original document, Mitt Romney would be serving as President Obama's vice president right now because he was the runner-up in the last presidential election. That part of the Constitution was fixed by the Twelfth Amendment, which set up the system we currently have of the president and vice president running for office together. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-its-time-to-repeal-the-second-amendment-right-bear-arms-20160613
June 13, 201610 yr :popcorn: I don't support this, BUT we are raising a generation in the Wild West who will be making decisions soon. Hard to believe they won't be eyeing the more progressive side of things.
June 13, 201610 yr Not going to happen, at least not in out lifetime. A government that gives weapons to cartel hitmen and terrorist is no position to tell it's citizens about whether or not they can carry guns. I would rather keep the 2nd amendment and work on things that can lower the violence. I prefer that than living in a nanny state like the UK, where a politician actually had to pass a bill so people can have options to protect themselves inside their own home.
June 13, 201610 yr Changing an Amendment is an almost impossible undertaking, no matter which one it is. Thanks founding fathers.
June 13, 201610 yr Author Texas will succeed from the union before this ever happens. Wouldn't that just be terrible.
June 13, 201610 yr Author Question to those who immediately and adamantly oppose: Do you believe the Constitution and its Amendments are still relevant to Today's world, up to the point that they should never be reconsidered?
June 13, 201610 yr Texas will succeed from the union before this ever happens. If that's the case lets get this thing crack-a-lackin'! :lol2:
June 13, 201610 yr Question to those who immediately and adamantly oppose: Do you believe the Constitution and its Amendments are still relevant to Today's world, up to the point that they should never be reconsidered? 100% relevant. However, an amendment is a change to the constitution. I will never be dumb enough (I hope) to say that the US government can't change a change or can't be considered. The only additional amendment to the constitution that I can see is adding term limits to congress.
June 13, 201610 yr I wouldn't be opposed to limiting magazines to 4 round max. Whatever you're legally allowed to hunt with should be it. I wouldn't be opposed to getting rid of "assault" weapons. I wouldn't ever buy one, as I don't see a practical use for it. Otherwise, I like my guns.
June 13, 201610 yr Changing an Amendment is an almost impossible undertaking, no matter which one it is. Thanks founding fathers. It's happened several times before.
June 13, 201610 yr Nobody is forcing anyone to live in a country founded with gun rights. If you don't support the constitution you are free to leave whenever you want.
June 13, 201610 yr Author Nobody is forcing anyone to live in a country founded with gun rights. If you don't support the constitution you are free to leave whenever you want. So then your answer to my question in Post#8 would be you don't believe we should ever change anything, correct?
June 13, 201610 yr Wouldn't that just be terrible. Actually it would. Don't know why anyone would think otherwise.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.