March 20, 201610 yr 10-1 so far. Total domination That's how it's done in college football right? Yes, no problem with it. Just as the SEC has dominated college football for a decade, the ACC has dominated college basketball. For a weekend.
March 20, 201610 yr I feel there is a great chance the ACC has 2 teams in the final 4, and if Duke can play a whole game like they played the first half vs. Yale they could have 3 teams in the final four. I don't think that Miami can beat Kansas, but one thing is for sure as of now the ACC has a chance to put 4 teams in the final four.
March 20, 201610 yr Author Yes, no problem with it. Just as the SEC has dominated college football for a decade, the ACC has dominated college basketball. For every weekend in March. Fixed it
March 20, 201610 yr The ACC has been dominant, no doubt. Outstanding basketball league and they are proving it again. UL would have added yet another potential Sweet 16 tram. Pac12 gets the title of most disappointing, clearly.
March 20, 201610 yr For perspective, 3 of the 5 that have made it to the Sweet 16 have yet to play anything but a double digit seed. The other two beat a 16 and a 9 seed. Not hating, I just get a kick out of people that make blanket statements about conference strengths/weaknesses based upon results in a single elimination tournament. Congrats Duke and Notre Dame for beating UNC Wilmington, Yale, Michigan, and Stephen F. Austin :thumb:
March 20, 201610 yr For perspective, 3 of the 5 that have made it to the Sweet 16 have yet to play anything but a double digit seed. The other two beat a 16 and a 9 seed. Not hating, I just get a kick out of people that make blanket statements about conference strengths/weaknesses based upon results in a single elimination tournament. Congrats Duke and Notre Dame for beating UNC Wilmington, Yale, Michigan, and Stephen F. Austin :thumb: Yeah. You're not hating. :lol2: Remember this mentality at the end of football season.
March 20, 201610 yr For perspective, 3 of the 5 that have made it to the Sweet 16 have yet to play anything but a double digit seed. The other two beat a 16 and a 9 seed. Not hating, I just get a kick out of people that make blanket statements about conference strengths/weaknesses based upon results in a single elimination tournament. Congrats Duke and Notre Dame for beating UNC Wilmington, Yale, Michigan, and Stephen F. Austin :thumb: Welp, West Virginia, Purdue, Cal, Michigan State, Arizona, et al found beating double digit seeds to be quite a challenge. The league has been great thus far, to argue that is crazy.
March 20, 201610 yr For perspective, 3 of the 5 that have made it to the Sweet 16 have yet to play anything but a double digit seed. The other two beat a 16 and a 9 seed. Not hating, I just get a kick out of people that make blanket statements about conference strengths/weaknesses based upon results in a single elimination tournament. Congrats Duke and Notre Dame for beating UNC Wilmington, Yale, Michigan, and Stephen F. Austin :thumb: Partially agree and partially disagree. Yes, they're playing lower seeds. And why might that be?
March 20, 201610 yr Author For perspective, 3 of the 5 that have made it to the Sweet 16 have yet to play anything but a double digit seed. The other two beat a 16 and a 9 seed. Not hating, I just get a kick out of people that make blanket statements about conference strengths/weaknesses based upon results in a single elimination tournament. Congrats Duke and Notre Dame for beating UNC Wilmington, Yale, Michigan, and Stephen F. Austin :thumb: Okay I'll flip this around. They didn't lose games they were supposed to like other conferences... Only reason Yale, SFA got through was because Big 12 choked as usual.
March 20, 201610 yr Author Partially agree and partially disagree. Yes, they're playing lower seeds. And why might that be? Beat me to it by mere seconds.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.