December 4, 201510 yr Some on here will argue that the FBI is wrong. And I would now argue against them. The FBI wanted to see what this event at the party was exactly, what may have set him off there? Were they planning a terrorist attack? Yes. But the question was, was this a terrorist attack or work place violence? What made them possibly move up their plans? As they had all of these pipe bombs left at home? Such things as the females FB? Or whatever it was around the time would have been a big clue to the FBI. This is just an odd situation, as it was a party for his work place and not a significant or very crowned place. Horrible lose of life, and it could have been a lot worse. Not to get too far off topic, but had the Feds determined what the shooting out in Colorado was? That would be the same, terrorism. Both of these involved US citizens.
December 4, 201510 yr And I would now argue against them. The FBI wanted to see what this event at the party was exactly, what may have set him off there? Were they planning a terrorist attack? Yes. But the question was, was this a terrorist attack or work place violence? What made them possibly move up their plans? As they had all of these pipe bombs left at home? Such things as the females FB? Or whatever it was around the time would have been a big clue to the FBI. This is just an odd situation, as it was a party for his work place and not a significant or very crowned place. Horrible lose of life, and it could have been a lot worse. Not to get too far off topic, but had the Feds determined what the shooting out in Colorado was? That would be the same, terrorism. Both of these involved US citizens. I say that they were planning more than one attack. That's why they left the rest of the pipe bombs at home and why they never left the area. Numerous terrorism experts have said that. It seems they were going back home when they were spotted by police who were outside of their apartment and the chase ensued. There is a distinct difference in the two shootings. The CA terrorists were willing to die for their cause, it's very evident the Colorado shooter wasn't.
December 4, 201510 yr I think you said before that you work in LE... What's your take on the FBI turning the killers' apartment back over to the owner and him allowing reporters into it? Am I wrong to think that seems stupid at this point? IMO it was a bad move. Most likely a case of the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. With this many agencies involved it could happen.
December 4, 201510 yr Until Obama comes out and says it and hurts the feelings of his pro Muslim campaign, it's not terrorism.
December 4, 201510 yr IMO it was a bad move. Most likely a case of the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. With this many agencies involved it could happen.Agree. At this point wouldn't anything in there be compromised?
December 4, 201510 yr Agree. At this point wouldn't anything in there be compromised? I would say so. Seems to me chain of custody has been destroyed. Again, they may have all they need from the scene. I really can't say.
December 4, 201510 yr Until Obama comes out and says it and hurts the feelings of his pro Muslim campaign, it's not terrorism. Sure it is. I don't the POTUS to tell me what is glaringly obvious.
December 4, 201510 yr Still no wife picture either. How the heck does she get into America without her face being seen. OK ISIS, start sending more women over here as wives so we don't have to know what they look like or anything about them. This seems to be an interest bordering on an obsession...
December 4, 201510 yr Agree. At this point wouldn't anything in there be compromised? I'd hope they have already removed anything they needed.
December 4, 201510 yr This seems to be an interest bordering on an obsession... Not an obsession but just want to know why we haven't seen her yet. Is it that easy to get into America and pass screenings without anyone ever seeing your face. Or were they afraid of the political correct police and afraid to ask her to take off her veil
December 4, 201510 yr The place was released back to the landlord so he/she can do whatever they want with it now. I would say that it is bad form though to let the news people inside to go through these people's things. Those items now belong to the baby and their family.
December 4, 201510 yr This seems to be an interest bordering on an obsession... I've asked the same question. I'm trying to figure out how you get here from the MS without a picture. I could careless what she looks like gezzz man. I'm a little worried maybe we have a loophole in this visa process. I honestly have never seen the media unable to get a picture of a killer, 48 hours after they were caught. Edited December 4, 201510 yr by TexasRanger add text
December 4, 201510 yr Wouldn't you think they would have dusted for fingerprints? None of the reporters, who were handling everything, yet did not have that black powder on them. Do they dust for prints differently, I hoped maybe they used another newer method ?
December 4, 201510 yr It's just very odd about what happened in that apartment today. No finger print dust? If the Feds didn't say that people could be in there, with this now being called a terrorist act, the landlord best be sure that he as given the ok, if not he could very likely face charges.
December 4, 201510 yr But either way, the landlord had no right to allow anyone but family in that apartment at this point. The press rummaging through private property?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.