February 11, 201511 yr Still pending a court case it says. So your saying Stoops should kick a guy off the team that hasn't been convicted of anything to this point. Guilty until proven innocent, gotcha.
February 11, 201511 yr So your saying Stoops should kick a guy off the team that hasn't been convicted of anything to this point. Guilty until proven innocent' date=' gotcha.[/quote'] You and Woody continue to ignore facts, his BAC is on file, he really was in a wreck, they really did put him in an a hospital. You all might take DUI crashes lightly and don't feel they warrant any punishment which he will never have from UK, keep rocking the blue blockers. It's sad you choose football over life.
February 11, 201511 yr You and Woody continue to ignore facts, his BAC is on file, he really was in a wreck, they really did put him in an a hospital. You all might take DUI crashes lightly and don't feel they warrant any punishment which he will never have from UK, keep rocking the blue blockers. It's sad you choose football over life. So what you are saying is OSU's Devin Smith should be in prison right now?
February 11, 201511 yr So what you are saying is OSU's Devin Smith should be in prison right now? If you want to start a Devin Smith thread then bring it but I'm not bringing OSU directly into UK threads. It's my understanding we are trying to go away from thread jacking. However, if you want to start a thread since you have the smoking gun... Please do I'll be glad to show everyone how wrong you are. Edited February 11, 201511 yr by John Anthony
February 12, 201511 yr You and Woody continue to ignore facts, his BAC is on file, he really was in a wreck, they really did put him in an a hospital. You all might take DUI crashes lightly and don't feel they warrant any punishment which he will never have from UK, keep rocking the blue blockers. It's sad you choose football over life. I'm not ignoring anything. Im just pointing out that in this wonderful country we live in, you are innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. If indeed he is convicted, then yes, he should be removed from the team. However, if by some chance he is not convicted and Stoops had removed him from the team prematurely, Stoops would have opened the school up to a potential lawsuit. I certainly don't choose football over life, but I also believe in allowing things to run their due course before condemning someone. Your constant attacks and subtle jabs at UK are quite entertaining though. At the same time it is a bit sad that you feel like you have to pick on UK football to make yourself feel better.
February 12, 201511 yr I'm not ignoring anything. Im just pointing out that in this wonderful country we live in, you are innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. If indeed he is convicted, then yes, he should be removed from the team. However, if by some chance he is not convicted and Stoops had removed him from the team prematurely, Stoops would have opened the school up to a potential lawsuit. I certainly don't choose football over life, but I also believe in allowing things to run their due course before condemning someone. Your constant attacks and subtle jabs at UK are quite entertaining though. At the same time it is a bit sad that you feel like you have to pick on UK football to make yourself feel better. What lawsuit? Playing football and receiving an athletic scholarship isn't a right. The coach can decide not to renew a scholarship simply because a player sucks or he didn't recruit him. He can certainly throw him off the team and pull his scholarship because he doesn't like the way he is representing the program--whether he is convicted or not. How about this: What if the player in question is crashes his car, flunks the field sobriety test, flunks the breathalyzer but the police officer messes up something in the arrest and the case gets thrown out on a technicality. Do you not think that the coach should treat him the same as if he'd been convicted?
February 12, 201511 yr Just so I'm clear, we are sayings a player should be thrown off the team and lose their scholarship for a first offense DUI?
February 12, 201511 yr Just so I'm clear, we are sayings a player should be thrown off the team and lose their scholarship for a first offense DUI? Did anyone say that? I didn't see where anyone posted that.
February 12, 201511 yr Did anyone say that? I didn't see where anyone posted that. I believe John Anthony brought it up, surprisingly.
February 12, 201511 yr What lawsuit? Playing football and receiving an athletic scholarship isn't a right. The coach can decide not to renew a scholarship simply because a player sucks or he didn't recruit him. He can certainly throw him off the team and pull his scholarship because he doesn't like the way he is representing the program--whether he is convicted or not. How about this: What if the player in question is crashes his car, flunks the field sobriety test, flunks the breathalyzer but the police officer messes up something in the arrest and the case gets thrown out on a technicality. Do you not think that the coach should treat him the same as if he'd been convicted? Obviously there is no lawsuit, since he hasn't been removed from the team. I'm not saying there would be, either way. But if you kick a player off from a team for a criminal violation before the person is ever convicted, yes, you open yourself up to a potential lawsuit. Of course this is Stoops team, but it just makes a lot more sense to let it play out in the court system, as it is supposed to in this country. Once it is settled, let Stoops do what he needs to do. Until a verdict is reached in court, I wouldn't do a damn thing if I were Stoops. People aren't always guilty of things they are charged with.
February 13, 201511 yr Tubman not indicted, anyone still think we should suspend / or worse these guys before the system does it's thing?
February 13, 201511 yr Did anyone say that? I didn't see where anyone posted that. You can't be that obtuse.
February 13, 201511 yr Tubman not indicted' date=' anyone still think we should suspend / or worse these guys before the system does it's thing?[/quote'] Trust me, there are lots.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.