Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Feinstein Has Just Released Details of Her New-and-Improved AWB

Featured Replies

^ Agree with you and Clyde.

 

What happened to the last AWB?

  • Replies 90
  • Views 10.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't buy the "they will eventually take our guns" argument.
Seems that was a common statement in every country that it became a reality.
Seems that was a common statement in every country that it became a reality.

 

How many of those countries had it in their founding document?

^ Agree with you and Clyde.

 

What happened to the last AWB?

 

 

Anyone?

How many of those countries had it in their founding document?

 

 

Here is a starter list of gun control and genocide events. Chart in middle. pdf link below chart.

 

Death by "Gun Control"

^ Agree with you and Clyde.

 

What happened to the last AWB?

It expired because it did nothing to make the country safer. We had like 9 school shooting during it's run. Columbine happened right in the middle of it. The fact is the bans do nothing, absolutely nothing. They may make you feel better but crazy people will always find ways to do crazy stuff.
^ Agree with you and Clyde.

 

What happened to the last AWB?

Expired after 10 years
I don't buy the "they will eventually take our guns" argument.

 

Let me ask you this Clyde. Let's assume this passes and we have another shooting. What do you think is next? More bans, then more bans, then more bans. The fact is your treating the symptom and not the cause. As long as that continues nothing changes.

Anyone?

 

If you are talking the Brady Bill and the last Federal 'assault weapons' ban. It expired in 2004.

 

Why was it not renewed. An answer is in the link I posted by the liberal gun enthusiest here.

 

Direct link to article here.

 

Excerpts from article:

 

"The National Institute of Justice found that the ban hadn’t reduced gun crime or crime involving “high capacity” magazines, and that the effects of renewing the ban were “likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.” It then added: “Assault weapons were rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.”

 

The Center for Disease Control released a study of gun control legislation, including the assault weapons ban and found “insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.”[10]

 

 

The National Research Council noted that all of the studies they had looked at “did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence” and noted “due to the fact that the relative rarity with which the banned guns were used in crime before the ban … the maximum potential effect of the ban on gun violence outcomes would be very small…”"

 

What is the REAL purpose of an AWB. The article points out that out by quoting a editorial from the Washington Post:

 

“No one should have any illusions about what was accomplished [by the ban]. Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime. The provision is mainly symbolic; its virtue will be if it turns out to be, as hoped, a stepping stone to broader gun control.” – Washington Post editorial, September 15, 1994

Let me ask you this Clyde. Let's assume this passes and we have another shooting. What do you think is next? More bans, then more bans, then more bans. The fact is your treating the symptom and not the cause. As long as that continues nothing changes.
That's the point, they'll continue to strip away at it until it's as worthless as the paper that even the bans are written on. In a nutshell, I firmly believe that is what politicians like Feinstein want. They don't like guns, period. Ultimately, they don't want anyone to own one. They're too ignorant to understand that these bans will never stop these senseless killings from happening. It's time to stop with the useless legislation and start working on the actual problem, as in figuring out what's changed to cause these acts, how do we spot potential offenders, how do we actually protect schools and other public places, what reasonable measures/treatment can be taken/given in regards to mentally ill people to prevent them from committing future acts of violence. Gun bans and gun free zones do absolutely nothing to address any of these.

My concern is the $200 tax stamp on guns owned.

  • Author
I don't buy the "they will eventually take our guns" argument.

 

 

Feinstein said on CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."

 

 

Words directly from her own mouth.

 

Everyday I am completely dumbfounded by intelligent, articulate people on here who say politicians will not do something when the politician has ACTUALLY SAID THEY would do it.......mind boggling.

My concern is the $200 tax stamp on guns owned.

 

Like raising taxes on cigarettes - its meant to discourage.

 

And if enforced it would raise probably around $20 billion.

 

I think this would hit right at the 2nd Amendment. This is a different flavor of the Stamp Tax that was one of the last straws to revolution in the late 1700s.

 

 

To enforce the Stamp Tax soldiers would right their own warrants. Come to your house, look for the Kings Stamp on every piece of paper you had. If you had paper without the Kings Stamp - off to jail you went or could if the soldiers decided to. And they could keep you indefinitely.

 

In today's worlds combine Feinsteins gun act, with NDAA (indefinite internment of US citizens) and then create a situation where it is known there many scofflaws and you will eventually need a door to door search that would be akin to the actions of the 'Stamp Act'.

 

History repeats - maybe.

 

Stamp Act 1765 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Words directly from her own mouth.

 

Everyday I am completely dumbfounded by intelligent, articulate people on here who say politicians will not do something when the politician has ACTUALLY SAID THEY would do it.......mind boggling.

 

Hey, move along. Nothing to see here......

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.