Original Rookie

Russ would have to go if they win it all right? Heard Behanan rumors, that can't be true can it? People who think that Russ can't play at the next level are nuts.

^Very good analysis. I have a couple of friends who are Michigan fans and they have complained about the defense all year. Due to the nature of UL D, teams usually shoot above their average from three against them. If Siva/Smith aren't in foul trouble then they will need to shoot well to stay in it. Foul trouble + 3s is really the only recipe I see for a UL loss.

18.5 pts and 7 asts per game. Dude is a flat out stud.

I never even said that I had a problem with the call, I just thought it was the wrong one. I had a problem with the suggestion that being a UK fan clouds judgement on all things Louisville. In what world does a call that effectively ends the game not have more weight than one made four minutes earlier?

:ohbrother:

The call wasn't as bad as the twitter world made it but to suggest that it wasn't close is funny. To suggest that some may have that opinion only because they are UK fans is even funnier.

I'm with you on Hardaway but Burke? On what planet is that guy overrated?

Siva played bad too. If Louisville was going to lose, it was going to be yesterday.

Not bitter at all about the result, but the "blue glasses" comments are comical. I saw many national guys and a couple of columns on how bad the late whistle was. I'm assuming those guys are all UK fans too right?

It really was a call that could have gone either way (or no whistle at all) and to say otherwise is laughable. It was not CLEAR one way or the other.

Hard to really go on that, that is called losing with class.

I just don't get it?

Must have been watching with those red goggles on Ram, must have been... no other way to explain it.

12 seconds in the game late? One was more relevant than the other.

I thought it was an overall bad call. Looked like a foul or no whistle to me.

The Hancock call gets more attention because it was at the end of the game when Wichita had the ball back with a shot to tie it. The questionable call took that away. Clearly, that is why this call is receiving a lot of discussion. Thought that one was pretty obvious.

Because I'm a UK fan duh. (fits the narrative of this board right?)

It's pretty obvious, do you really want me to answer? :ohbrother:

That was sarcasm.... I can show 1000 tweets from my timeline of non UK fans who thought the same if you would like.

Personally, I thought Hancock fouled him before he got the ball. If he didn't then yea jump ball.

:lol2: There it is! Yep, only UK fans thought the calls were bad. :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

Give me a break. The calls could have gone either way at best.

I thought SVT fouled first and much more, no doubt that it was not flagrant though.

It is incidental but not a double foul. That was bad.

You don't see a difference?