Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I think it's St.X and everyone else. With that being said, the 2nd Trinity/X game is the one that really counts. SK is much improved from last season, they've taken that experience and taken it to a higher level. SK may not get past the third round but it won't be because they digressed. BTW if SK and X play will it be @SK?

Posted
I reluctantly have to agree. But I think 2-3 are alot closer than most would care to admit.

 

I think you are correct. I'm not about to say SK is better than Trinity but I think SK would put up a much better fight.

Posted
I think you are correct. I'm not about to say SK is better than Trinity but I think SK would put up a much better fight.

 

 

Agreed, if it were any team but Trinity, however, it is Trinity.

Posted
I think it's St.X and everyone else. With that being said, the 2nd Trinity/X game is the one that really counts. SK is much improved from last season, they've taken that experience and taken it to a higher level. SK may not get past the third round but it won't be because they digressed. BTW if SK and X play will it be @SK?

 

I'm pretty sure they would meet up in Independence. I for one would like to see that atomosphere.

Posted

I am a Ryle guy but from what I saw the other night I think SK can play with anyone. They have a lot of athletes, team speed, and the best one two rushing punch in the state.

Posted
X yes, I think Trinity need to make it to .500 first. :laugh:

 

Agreed,they have played a decent scedule, but when you have been getting smoked you can't rely on just your name.

Posted
X yes, I think Trinity need to make it to .500 first. :laugh:

 

Perhaps the first thing that needs to happen is for SK to score their first points on Trinity, ever.

 

2001: 60-0

2005: 52-0

2008: 48-0

 

Let's keep things in the accurate perspective.

Posted
Perhaps the first thing that needs to happen is for SK to score their first points on Trinity, ever.

 

2001: 60-0

2005: 52-0

2008: 48-0

 

Let's keep things in the accurate perspective.

 

Living in the past. :laugh:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.