September 29, 200916 yr I said I wanted a OC like Leach with Brooks as HC, I would take Leach as HC if Brooks left. Leach is like 79-42 at a school that is very similar to UK football wise. BCS conference and about same in the pecking order. Difference is that the 2nd and 3rd tier kids he can get in Texas would quite often be first tier guys in Kentucky.
September 29, 200916 yr Difference is that the 2nd and 3rd tier kids he can get in Texas would quite often be first tier guys in Kentucky. True, very true.
September 29, 200916 yr Hartline is Kentucky's third string quarterback. Bill Stull has completed 70% of his passes for Pitt -- six touchdowns to just one INT. Curtis Pulley is the three-time MEAC Player of the Week at Florida A&M. 24-of-34 for 315 yards and two touchdowns in their win over Tennessee State tonight.[/quote When, and how long was Bill Stull at UK?
September 29, 200916 yr I said I wanted a OC like Leach with Brooks as HC, I would take Leach as HC if Brooks left. Leach is like 79-42 at a school that is very similar to UK football wise. BCS conference and about same in the pecking order. Texas Tech gets to recruit the state of Texas. Sure they get the left overs from Texas and Oklahoma and to some extent Texas A&M, but they still get to bring in some very good players. I like Leach, I just don't think you want to be a throw it every down type of team in the SEC if you're Kentucky. UK's best shot of beating teams is playing good defense, and controlling the game. The Air Raid would put points on the board, but I don't know if you want to lose the T.O.P battle against the likes of Bama, UF, LSU, etc. Really my argument is that the Leach stuff was here before and it ran it's course. UK is much better off than they were in the late 90's as a program. The difference in Leach now is that he has talent. Mumme and him put up some good numbers here but not wins in the same way that UK does now. With the type of players UK can bring in SEC defenses would destroy the Air Raid, IMO. We cannot protect long enough to throw anything more than a quick hitch, so I don't see how we could run Mesh, Shallow, Y sail or anything else right now. What Jokes does is fine. He has a very good offense. Look at what he did in 2006 and 2007 when he had talent. In 2007 UK scored 42 on Arkansas, 43 on LSU, 37 on UF, 50 on Tennessee, 35 on Florida State. Some of those were overtime games, but to say Joker cannot coach good offensive football is offbase IMO. Give the man a legit QB and he can get the team in the endzone. Right now passing the ball the only thing the coaching staff trust Hartline with is the "Quick Game". That is the basis for the UK passing offense, but when you cannot stretch the field the quick hitches, screens, slants, etc. just aren't going to work as well.
September 29, 200916 yr Texas Tech gets to recruit the state of Texas. Sure they get the left overs from Texas and Oklahoma and to some extent Texas A&M, but they still get to bring in some very good players. I like Leach, I just don't think you want to be a throw it every down type of team in the SEC if you're Kentucky. UK's best shot of beating teams is playing good defense, and controlling the game. The Air Raid would put points on the board, but I don't know if you want to lose the T.O.P battle against the likes of Bama, UF, LSU, etc. Really my argument is that the Leach stuff was here before and it ran it's course. UK is much better off than they were in the late 90's as a program. The difference in Leach now is that he has talent. Mumme and him put up some good numbers here but not wins in the same way that UK does now. With the type of players UK can bring in SEC defenses would destroy the Air Raid, IMO. We cannot protect long enough to throw anything more than a quick hitch, so I don't see how we could run Mesh, Shallow, Y sail or anything else right now. What Jokes does is fine. He has a very good offense. Look at what he did in 2006 and 2007 when he had talent. In 2007 UK scored 42 on Arkansas, 43 on LSU, 37 on UF, 50 on Tennessee, 35 on Florida State. Some of those were overtime games, but to say Joker cannot coach good offensive football is offbase IMO. Give the man a legit QB and he can get the team in the endzone. Right now passing the ball the only thing the coaching staff trust Hartline with is the "Quick Game". That is the basis for the UK passing offense, but when you cannot stretch the field the quick hitches, screens, slants, etc. just aren't going to work as well. I see what you are saying. My next question is can UK bring in the type of talent to run Jokers offense consistently then? Those years UK had a very, very talented WR group along with a QB who MANY overrated.
September 29, 200916 yr I see what you are saying. My next question is can UK bring in the type of talent tor un Jokers offense consistently then? Those years UK had a very, very talented WR group along with a QB who MANY overrated. Andre Woodson legitimately WON some games at UK. Big time QB's do that. He won them. Not managed them to wins, but he WON them. He may not turn into a good QB in the pros (which has to do alot with his throwing motion), but he was a very good QB in college. He didn't put up the stats Couch did, but I thought he was just as good. With Newton and Moss being so highly rated I think that they can get it done. UK's recruiting will continue to get better under Joker. He is a younger guy and seems like a friendly guy so I think kids will really like that. I don't think what UK does is that hard to find a QB for, I just don't think Hartline has shown the ability to make reads quick enough to hit the deeper passes in UK's offense.
September 29, 200916 yr I see what you are saying. My next question is can UK bring in the type of talent to run Jokers offense consistently then? Those years UK had a very, very talented WR group along with a QB who MANY overrated. Many may have misjudged his NFL prospects, but Andre Woodson wasn't overrated as a college football player. Some guys are just great college players that don't have what it takes to be great pros, while other guys fly under the radar at the collegiate level and explode in the NFL. Woodson was a great college QB.
September 29, 200916 yr Andre Woodson legitimately WON some games at UK. Big time QB's do that. He won them. Not managed them to wins, but he WON them. He may not turn into a good QB in the pros (which has to do alot with his throwing motion), but he was a very good QB in college. He didn't put up the stats Couch did, but I thought he was just as good. With Newton and Moss being so highly rated I think that they can get it done. UK's recruiting will continue to get better under Joker. He is a younger guy and seems like a friendly guy so I think kids will really like that. I don't think what UK does is that hard to find a QB for, I just don't think Hartline has shown the ability to make reads quick enough to hit the deeper passes in UK's offense. I have to believe that of the two, one of them will give UK what it needs from the QB position. I think Joker Phillips is one of the better OC's and play callers in college football. He just doesn't have the firepower, particularly under center, to work with right now. UK fans are just going to have to be patient and deal with Hartline for now. Brooks and company have this thing headed in the right direction. Three straight bowl wins...it would be insane to turn on them for one frustrating season when they're struggling at the QB position. I have no problem with a switch at QB, if they believe one of the freshmen can get it done. But, what I don't want to see is a switch just to be switching, when they aren't sold one of those guys can handle everything. It would be risky, IMO, to throw one of those freshmen in against 'Bama, or on the road @ South Carolina or Auburn. I'm not a Hartline guy, but I'm also not totally sold on UK's offensive line and it's WR's right now. I'd rather play conservative this year, try to win with defense against a tough schedule, and let Hartline take one for the team so to speak, than throw one of the freshmen into a situation where success is unlikely.
September 29, 200916 yr Many may have misjudged his NFL prospects, but Andre Woodson wasn't overrated as a college football player. Some guys are just great college players that don't have what it takes to be great pros, while other guys fly under the radar at the collegiate level and explode in the NFL. Woodson was a great college QB. I totally understand that and in no way am I saying he was a bad college QB. I just think a TON of people overlooked how good UK was at the WR position. Those guys made him look good on more than a few occasions. I some do not realize what Hartline has to work with, Cobb and thats it. Everyone wants the deep ball and a verticla passing game but if WR cannot get seperation, you are stuck with what UK has.
September 29, 200916 yr I totally understand that and in no way am I saying he was a bad college QB. I just think a TON of people overlooked how good UK was at the WR position. Those guys made him look good on more than a few occasions. I some do not realize what Hartline has to work with, Cobb and thats it. Everyone wants the deep ball and a verticla passing game but if WR cannot get seperation, you are stuck with what UK has. Matthews is a big time WR. He got deep once against UF and was thrown a horrible pass. He had a few plays called back on penalties. I actually think his is a better WR than Cobb. Cobb is a better player and playmaker, but in terms of being a pure Wide Out, I think Matthews is a little more advanced. I think if UK had a QB it would show.
September 29, 200916 yr I have to believe that of the two, one of them will give UK what it needs from the QB position. I think Joker Phillips is one of the better OC's and play callers in college football. He just doesn't have the firepower, particularly under center, to work with right now. UK fans are just going to have to be patient and deal with Hartline for now. Brooks and company have this thing headed in the right direction. Three straight bowl wins...it would be insane to turn on them for one frustrating season when they're struggling at the QB position. I have no problem with a switch at QB, if they believe one of the freshmen can get it done. But, what I don't want to see is a switch just to be switching, when they aren't sold one of those guys can handle everything. It would be risky, IMO, to throw one of those freshmen in against 'Bama, or on the road @ South Carolina or Auburn. I'm not a Hartline guy, but I'm also not totally sold on UK's offensive line and it's WR's right now. I'd rather play conservative this year, try to win with defense against a tough schedule, and let Hartline take one for the team so to speak, than throw one of the freshmen into a situation where success is unlikely. My thing is that those guys have to get experience some time. It does them little good in their 3rd year to be starting if they haven't played before. Practice is fine but it cannot simulate playing in an SEC game. With the things that UK does I don't think that it would be too hard to put one of them in. UK treats Hartline like he is basically a first year player, so I would rather get a real talent on the field, and try to get them up to snuff earlier. Frosh QB's cannot usually "Win" games, especially in the SEC, but I think a frosh would be fine doing what UK allows Hartline to do.
September 29, 200916 yr ^^With the exception that I wouldn't run all the checks at the line. They really haven't worked anyways.
September 29, 200916 yr ^^With the exception that I wouldn't run all the checks at the line. They really haven't worked anyways. Yeah, I got tired of UK checking everyplay at the line. I don't mind changing a play every now and then, but Hartline is audibling (or atleast looking to the sideline to change the call) more than Peyton Manning.
September 29, 200916 yr Yeah, I got tired of UK checking everyplay at the line. I don't mind changing a play every now and then, but Hartline is audibling (or atleast looking to the sideline to change the call) more than Peyton Manning. They did it alot with Woodson as well. I think it can be good, but if you are going to run the check stuff at the line you had better be able to get plays in quick and be able to change them even quicker. Alot of spread teams do it, but most like UF, Oklahoma, OK State can get those plays in so quick it doesn't take much time.
September 30, 200916 yr Just go to youtube and you will see Newton. He can run the ball well to. If not this year, it will be next. He will be the man here.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.