September 11, 200917 yr Yes multiple sources.... this from factcheck.org The House bill contains a section (Sec. 246) titled "NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS," which states: "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States." :popcorn: Actually all I heard on local talk radio was the above denouncing Wilson for the fact that the above was written into the bill. :thumb:
September 11, 200917 yr They're both disrespectful, any argument to the contrary is disingenuous. Incidentally, has nayone claimed that Joe Wilson was incorrect in his assertion? Maybe, maybe not. Thats part of the problem. There is enough smoke and mirrors in this bill to claim anything. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/09/from-the-fact-check-desk-illegal-immigrants-and-health-care-reform.html Would the House bill allow illegal immigrants to purchase health insurance in a health insurance exchange? It doesn’t restrict it, though White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said he didn’t think the version of the law the president would sign would allow such a thing. Could the House bill expand emergency Medicaid laws as they already exist, perhaps – perhaps -- expanding coverage for illegal immigrants in keeping with current law? According to CRS: Yes.
September 11, 200917 yr Author Politics, plain and simple. It's not the same as calling the President a liar ... I asked if it was right or wrong. If you can't see that it was wrong, then... I have no problem with any of it. Just as I wouldn't have a problem if any president would call them out.Did you have a problem with Wilson? You are comparing apples to Onions here RTS the two incidents are not remotely similar . They were actually cheering a remark that the President said . All be it cynically . At a State of the Union address there are expected to be interruptions and applause and I dare say that a lot of that applause was to drown out the Democrats .:lol: Disrespect is disrespect. Unless of course it's against a guy you don't care for, I suppose. They're both disrespectful, any argument to the contrary is disingenuous.:thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
September 11, 200917 yr :popcorn: Actually all I heard on local talk radio was the above denouncing Wilson for the fact that the above was written into the bill. :thumb: Then why the continued ref to 45 million (or what ever the exact number is) uninsured?
September 11, 200917 yr They're both disrespectful, any argument to the contrary is disingenuous. Incidentally, has nayone claimed that Joe Wilson was incorrect in his assertion? Depends on the meaning of "lie". http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090910/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_fact_check Let's call it stretching the truth. However, at the point Wilson was making a fool of himself, Obama was right on in his assertion.
September 11, 200917 yr I don't think interrupting the POTUS during a speech is appropriate. Just a matter of respect IMHO. However, I have problems with either side saying either it does or doesn't cover illegal aliens. Most of what I am hearing is that there aren't enough specifics out there to read or vote on.
September 11, 200917 yr Then why the continued ref to 45 million (or what ever the exact number is) uninsured? Because 45 sounds better than 15 or so million. Actually a great point was made the other day. The truth is that illegal aliens are going into our hospitals right now with injuries and illness. They are getting health care and the hospital is having to write them off when they don't pay and/or the hospitals are not asking for "proof of citizenship" documentation. So the point was, How is this bill passing any different than what ALREADY EXISTS? The bill states it would be illegal but the dividing point, as I understand it, is there is no system in place to check for documentation or to enforce this aspect of it. (Just as there is not one right now. :thumb:
September 11, 200917 yr They're both disrespectful, any argument to the contrary is disingenuous. Incidentally, has nayone claimed that Joe Wilson was incorrect in his assertion? He was VERY incorrect. Some rude folks would even say he was lying.
September 11, 200917 yr Because 45 sounds better than 15 or so million. Actually a great point was made the other day. The truth is that illegal aliens are going into our hospitals right now with injuries and illness. They are getting health care and the hospital is having to write them off when they don't pay and/or the hospitals are not asking for "proof of citizenship" documentation. So the point was, How is this bill passing any different than what ALREADY EXISTS? The bill states it would be illegal but the dividing point, as I understand it, is there is no system in place to check for documentation or to enforce this aspect of it. (Just as there is not one right now. :thumb: It's not only illegals doing this but plenty of US citizens also. What makes the congress think they will pay for something when they get the care now and don't have to pay.
September 11, 200917 yr The support that Wilson has received is one more shining example of just how fragmented our nation is politically.
September 12, 200917 yr The support that Wilson has received is one more shining example of just how fragmented our nation is politically. Who has supported him? I haven't watched tv this week but everything I've read online had everyone blasting him.
September 12, 200917 yr It's becoming harder and harder to support my party. I'm close to changing over to the dark side.
September 12, 200917 yr Who has supported him? I haven't watched tv this week but everything I've read online had everyone blasting him. Rush Limbaugh Tea Party protesters 9.12 ers
September 12, 200917 yr It's becoming harder and harder to support my party. I'm close to changing over to the dark side. Welcome to the Libertarian Party.
September 14, 200917 yr Rush Limbaugh Tea Party protesters 9.12 ers How do these fringe players, who by the way exist on both sides, support your comment? You give the leading media clown and individuals at protests as examples? These types have always existed, they're just getting more face time given the internet and cable need to fill time. I thought you were talking about legitimate sources. I do agree that our nation is becomming more and more politically fragmented. I just think all we need to do is look at who we elect as shining examples.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.