October 20, 200817 yr That quote by Powell is very, very disappointing. "He has met the standard of being a successful President" because of his rhetorical ability, reaching out across the country and inspiring? Did he really say that? That's pitiful. Did you watch the entirety of his endorsement or just a snippet taken out of context from someone else's post? Powell gave a much more reasoned rationale than the bolded. He spoke of Obama's steadiness, his intellectual curiosity, his depth of knowledge, and his intellectual rigor. Watch the Meet the Press video if you haven't already. It's only about 7 minutes long.
October 20, 200817 yr Did you watch the entirety of his endorsement or just a snippet taken out of context from someone else's post? Powell gave a much more reasoned rationale than the bolded. He spoke of Obama's steadiness, his intellectual curiosity, his depth of knowledge, and his intellectual rigor. Watch the Meet the Press video if you haven't already. It's only about 7 minutes long. I would also like to suggest that everyone watch the press conference after he appeared on Meet the Press.
October 20, 200817 yr Did you watch the entirety of his endorsement or just a snippet taken out of context from someone else's post? Powell gave a much more reasoned rationale than the bolded. He spoke of Obama's steadiness, his intellectual curiosity, his depth of knowledge, and his intellectual rigor. Watch the Meet the Press video if you haven't already. It's only about 7 minutes long. Out of context? At the end of the 7 minute video, Colin Powell summarized his reasons in the thirty second, verbatim quote that I transcribed and posted above.
October 20, 200817 yr Except that Powell said that John McCain would make a fine President. You are right. I am voting for McCain because he isn't Obama. Colin Powell is voting for Obama because he isn't a Republican, more or less. That is the difference. Pardon me if I should already know this (or if you don't wish to discuss it), but are you a republican?
October 20, 200817 yr Pardon me if I should already know this (or if you don't wish to discuss it), but are you a republican? I am registered as a Republican, if that is what you mean, but I have never voted for anyone simply because of their party affiliation.
October 20, 200817 yr I am registered as a Republican, if that is what you mean, but I have never voted for anyone simply because of their party affiliation. Good. I don't either. My point is that you are disillusioned with a candidate (Obama). Powell is showing that he is disillusioned with a whole party.
October 20, 200817 yr Good. I don't either. My point is that you are disillusioned with a candidate (Obama). Powell is showing that he is disillusioned with a whole party. Okay, I think you get my point that Colin Powell's endorsement is more about the Republican Party than it is about Barack Obama.
October 20, 200817 yr Okay, I think you get my point that Colin Powell's endorsement is more about the Republican Party than it is about Barack Obama. Yes, I do. Just like many that vote for McCain - they do so against Obama and not really FOR McCain.
October 20, 200817 yr Yes, I do. Just like many that vote for McCain - they do so against Obama and not really FOR McCain. And THAT, is what is so frustrating about our current choices.
October 20, 200817 yr And THAT, is what is so frustrating about our current choices. I guess. I actually liked both choices, so I am one of those rare ones that it wasn't who I was wanting to vote against, but who I wanted to vote FOR.
October 20, 200817 yr That quote by Powell is very, very disappointing. "He has met the standard of being a successful President" because of his rhetorical ability, reaching out across the country and inspiring? Did he really say that? That's pitiful. I don't know if rhetorical ability is a sufficient qualification to be President, but I have to admit that it can be a helpful quality. IMO, part of the reason FDR was a good President is that he instilled hope in the minds of the American people (as opposed to his New Deal programs).
October 20, 200817 yr I apologize for bringing race into this thread, but at this time I will agree with Rush. Powell's endorsement of Obama is nothing but race. I can't give the exact quote by Rush but it goes something like this...Research how many inexperienced liberal "white" candidates Powell has endorsed in the past and you will see race start creeping in. Powell claims to have been a friend of McCain's for 25 years and highly respected him. He's just getting to know Obama and turns his back on McCain???? Again, I'm sorry, but this sounds like a race endorsement to me.
October 20, 200817 yr Just for the record I am a registered Republican. That being said, the reasons for this are two fold, in order to be allowed to vote in every election I have to register with one of the two major parties. I more closely (though not entirely) align with the Republican platform, thus my choice. I vote issues and choose the candidate that I believe more closely aligns with Judeo-Christian values. I would never knowingly vote for a pro-abortion candidate. Call me a single issue voter if you wish but I feel God honors those who stand up for the unborn who cannot speak for themselves. Both parties have huge issues, the Republicans in my opinion have less.
October 21, 200817 yr Feel as you wish. If one posts an ambiguous post, then one can expect that misinterpretation should ensue. If you read further, you'll see that scooterbob did exactly what I outline. But, if you choose to not read his admission, that's your choice. Frankly, I'm tired of being accused of misinterpreting posts because people either can't be bothered to fully explain themselves, or they are deliberately baiting. Both occur. So you assume the worst about someone just because they don't fully explain themselves? Wow. Sorry, but that's nothing but prejudging someone. Call it whatever you want, but its prejudging.
October 21, 200817 yr So you assume the worst about someone just because they don't fully explain themselves? Wow. Sorry, but that's nothing but prejudging someone. Call it whatever you want, but its prejudging. I didn't make any assumptions. If you'll re-read the posts and the sequence of them, you'll see I merely stated that the rightous indignation displayed by scooterbob could have been avoided if he'd have fully explained himself.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.