January 28, 200818 yr Try explaining that to Tennessee. So now we are saying Tubby was able to leave players behind that are good enough to compete with the best teams in the country.Things are always changing here on BGP...
January 28, 200818 yr So now we are saying Tubby was able to leave players behind that are good enough to compete with the best teams in the country.Things are always changing here on BGP... They can compete with any team in the country, but they can't win 30+ games and a national championship. Big difference there.
January 28, 200818 yr They can compete with any team in the country, but they can't win 30+ games and a national championship. Big difference there. How many teams do you think can win 30 games this year??
January 28, 200818 yr So someone clear this up for me because I need to know... Did Tubby leave a really good UK team or did he leave a team on par with Minnesota as far as talent goes?
January 28, 200818 yr How many teams do you think can win 30 games this year?? Memphis, North Carolina, Duke, Kansas, and UCLA will all be in the running.
January 28, 200818 yr So someone clear this up for me because I need to know... Did Tubby leave a really good UK team or did he leave a team on par with Minnesota as far as talent goes? Neither.
January 28, 200818 yr So what DID he do? He left players that are talented for many schools but not the elite players that should be at UK, UNC, Duke, UCLA, Kansas, etc.
January 28, 200818 yr Well, Tubbycat says they're pretty evenly matched so I was just wondering. I be honest I saw that to. However by looking at his post after that, I think he worded it wrong without realizing it still. Because there is no way for anyone to really think Minnesota has as much talent as UK, when UK is healthy...
January 28, 200818 yr I didn't say I was bored, I said your presence was missed... There's nothing to read between those lines. :lol: :lol:
January 28, 200818 yr So someone clear this up for me because I need to know... Did Tubby leave a really good UK team or did he leave a team on par with Minnesota as far as talent goes? My opinion on this UK team is that it has as much talent as the past 2 teams have, but due to injuries and a new coach they have underachieved. No way is the talent on this team on par with the likes of Memphis, Duke, UNC, UCLA, Kansas, etc....but they have 6 guys that IMO can compete with any of those teams on any given night...They have abosolutely no depth though, which is what would kill them.
January 29, 200818 yr I think Minnesota's three game losing streak will come to a end this Thrusday night at Michigan. IMO, GO TUBBY;)
January 29, 200818 yr The top 6 players on UK's roster according to posters on here are: Bradley, Crawford, Meeks, Jasper, Patterson, and Stevenson--and I agree. I do not think that Minnesota's top 6 are as good as UK's top 6. The rest of the roster I would say would be up for grabs. As far as playing a game, I think the game would be extremely close because both teams are similar. There is no DOUBT that UK is better when a healthy Jasper and Meeks are playing. Those two guys were top-35 recruits and they can ball. Just because we beat Tennessee and they were 5th in the country at the time does not mean we can match up w/any team in the nation top-6 against top-6.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.