Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Kentucky 27 Vanderbilt 20

Featured Replies

  • Replies 61
  • Views 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Author
After today UK's record will be one game better than UL's...You really want to have this arguement?

 

:ylsuper:

:ylsuper:

 

Haha...You've been waitin' for that, haven't you? :lol: :jump:

  • Author
Haha...You've been waitin' for that, haven't you? :lol: :jump:

 

:jump:

Cats survived. That's what they had to do.

Sloppy but hey its a win on the road in SEC. Now get ready for Moreno and UGA.

This was a big and needed win for the Cats, now lets get Georgia, Go Cats:dancingpa

I don't have ESPN U, but Tom Leach said that he had seen better refereeing in a pee-wee game.

 

Good win for the cats!

I don't have ESPN U, but Tom Leach said that he had seen better refereeing in a pee-wee game.

 

Good win for the cats!

 

The worst I have ever seen. I was fortunate enough to see it on TV and I couldn't believe one thing that happened. Vandy fumbled toward the end of the first half and it was ruled a non fumble on the field. Brooks challenged the call and it wasn't reversed because they said it wasn't reviewable. My question and the TV crew's question is how can Brooks lose his challenge on a play that can't be challenged? And it was clearly a fumble, not even close.

The worst I have ever seen. I was fortunate enough to see it on TV and I couldn't believe one thing that happened. Vandy fumbled toward the end of the first half and it was ruled a non fumble on the field. Brooks challenged the call and it wasn't reversed because they said it wasn't reviewable. My question and the TV crew's question is how can Brooks lose his challenge on a play that can't be challenged? And it was clearly a fumble, not even close.

I didn't see the game, what was so different about the play that the fumble couldn't be challenged?

I didn't see the game, what was so different about the play that the fumble couldn't be challenged?

 

It was never ruled a fumble. Since it was never ruled a fumble, it couldn't be reviewed. You can't review a fumble that wasn't "technically" ruled a fumble on the field. But UK should have got thier timeout back I would think.

 

If a ref would have called it a fumble it would have been reviewable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.