June 19, 200719 yr Someone tell me again. Why are we carrying 3 catchers, that are all hitting miserably?
June 19, 200719 yr I can't even remember the last time I saw Moeller on the field. He caught Homer last game and will probably catch him again.
June 19, 200719 yr He caught Homer last game and will probably catch him again. Thats probably why I didn't notice. I was watching Homer. He is still worthless.
June 19, 200719 yr Someone tell me again. Why are we carrying 3 catchers, that are all hitting miserably? Because you never know when one might CATCH FIRE! :lol:
June 19, 200719 yr Someone tell me again. Why are we carrying 3 catchers, that are all hitting miserably? Please stop thinking of Valentin as a catcher. He is a pinch hitter who can catch if needed.
June 19, 200719 yr Author Please stop thinking of Valentin as a catcher. He is a pinch hitter who can catch if needed. That would involve far too much logic...
June 19, 200719 yr I'm hearing that Dunn is basically a Padre, pending on a physical. He will be traded for 2 pitchers. Helnsly being one and Hickson or something like that being other.
June 19, 200719 yr I'm hearing that Dunn is basically a Padre, pending on a physical. He will be traded for 2 pitchers. Helnsly being one and Hickson or something like that being other. I really hope you are wrong.
June 19, 200719 yr Please stop thinking of Valentin as a catcher. He is a pinch hitter who can catch if needed. And his batting avg? And if he gets on to start a late inning rally hes going to steal a base for you? Score from 1st on a double. And when he does pinch hit Narroon leaves him in to catch (when he could have Moeller in) and he gives up a critical passed ball in the 9th. Yeah hes the answer.
June 19, 200719 yr I'm hearing that Dunn is basically a Padre, pending on a physical. He will be traded for 2 pitchers. Helnsly being one and Hickson or something like that being other. Taking 1530 as Gospel is a bad idea. Especially when they even said the info came from an anonymous e-mailer named "Cincy Blue."
June 19, 200719 yr Author Taking 1530 as Gospel is a bad idea. Especially when they even said the info came from an anonymous e-mailer named "Cincy Blue." :thumb:
June 19, 200719 yr Taking 1530 as Gospel is a bad idea. Especially when they even said the info came from an anonymous e-mailer named "Cincy Blue." Wasn't listening to 1530, someone at work just told me this at lunch.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.