January 29, 200719 yr Overall, he is a very good player and a tough match-up for any team. He is only a sophomore so only time will tell. You would expect his scoring to increase each year, so, by the time he is finished he very well could have some career stats that no one at Duke has ever had. BTW, Chuck Hayes is in the NBA and doing pretty well for himself (and the Rockets) and his JR/SR stats weren't what McRoberts are.
January 29, 200719 yr Really? Come on dude....geez Let's compare: Josh McRoberts: 12.9 ppg, 8.15 rpg, 3.95 apg, 2.48 bpg, 1.19 spg Randolph Morris: 15.6 ppg, 7.6 rpg, 1.1 apg, 2.04 bpg, .52 spg McRoberts has the edge... My numbers and your numbers aren't the same.. Per rivals. Randolph Morris: 16.1ppg, 8.1rpg, 1.1apg, 2.2bpg, .50spg, in 28.4mpg Josh McRoberts: 12.6ppg, 7.7rpg, 4.1apg, 2.5bpg, 1.2spg, in 34.5mpg Other than the assists (which most centers don't average many) the numbers are basically even, though Morris plays 6 less minutes per game, which you fail to take into consideration. You act like it isn't even close. But honestly, I don't think either are "legendary." Like I said, I'll take Morris' numbers, you can have McRoberts. I have my opinion and you have yours.
January 29, 200719 yr Author ^ I went to Duke's website, and UK's website...I suggest you do the same, they are way more accurate.
January 29, 200719 yr ^ I went to Duke's website, and UK's website...I suggest you do the same, they are way more accurate. No need to, as it doesn't really matter, the numbers are basically even. Like I said, I have my opinion and you have yours. Can't you just leave it at that?:sleep:
January 29, 200719 yr With all apologies to GT (cause I know he's already spoken for) I'll take Durrant. 24.4 pts, 11.7 rbs, 1.7 ast, 1.8 blk, 1.4 stl. As compared to McRoberts he gives up 2.3 ast and .6 blk but has better stats (pts by far) in the other categories.
January 29, 200719 yr With all apologies to GT (cause I know he's already spoken for) I'll take Durrant. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
January 29, 200719 yr Author With all apologies to GT (cause I know he's already spoken for) I'll take Durrant. 24.4 pts, 11.7 rbs, 1.7 ast, 1.8 blk, 1.4 stl. As compared to McRoberts he gives up 2.3 ast and .6 blk but has better stats (pts by far) in the other categories. Of course, I would take him as well.
January 29, 200719 yr Author Balanced = legendary, I'm lost. Not yet....though he is statistically the MOST balanced in Duke history....that speaks for something.
January 29, 200719 yr Not yet....though he is statistically the MOST balanced in Duke history....that speaks for something. Who was the most balanced player in Duke history before Josh McRoberts?
January 29, 200719 yr Author I need to look, though I would think Grant Hill, Laettner, or Dawkins would be the type of people...Maybe Shane Battier.
January 29, 200719 yr How does he stack up against Mike Gymenski sure I spelled that wrong, but I remember him being a great all around player. Also the forward that played with him, I think his last name was Banks was pretty awsome too. I'm an oldtimer so I remember before Coach K.
January 29, 200719 yr Author Giminski was more the mold of Shelden Williams....a "back to the basket" post player, a true rebounder, and shot blocker.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.