4 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Covington Catholic beat Boone County 39-6. 

South Warren beat Eastern 44-6.

What is your point?  Eddie isn't going to run it up on Bryson.  Not sure on how South Warren rolls with these things. 

I think the jury is still out on WC IMO...weak schedule outside of FC game. However, I believe FC was without their starting QB and Morrmon was playing but hurt. They have some pieces, including their QB Patterson. He's always had a great arm but Johnson never would throw the ball...I think he finally figured it out and taking advantage of it. They are pounding bad teams which they should do so who knows...I do know that they are not a legit 4th in the TP94 - several teams behind them that would give them a lot of smoke. The West Jess game in on Prepspin Youtube so you can watch their most recent game. West Jess is absolutely terrible and they pounded them into the turf. 

1 hour ago, Tkinslow said:

Well I seen them against Glasgow and mind you weird stuff happens the first game of the season but they were dominating. And it’s not like Glasgow has struggled this season they beat two really good teams in Russellville and Greenwood and the weaker teams they have played they have blowed out. I also don’t see the Franklin Co win by only 3 points as a bad team I still think Franklin is a really good team. I can absolutely see WC getting to the semi finals and then who knows. So to answer your question I do believe WC is deserving of a #4 ranking in 5A.

Glasgow is #2 in 3A RPI - CAL would run clock them in the 1st half. 

4 minutes ago, theguru said:

What is your point?  Eddie isn't going to run it up on Bryson.  Not sure on how South Warren rolls with these things. 

 Quibbling because one team beat another by 3 touchdowns instead of 4 or 5 is an exercise in futility. I am not much of a fan of score comparisons because weird things happen on a game by game basis. The potshots at Woodford County because they beat Campbell County 34 - 13 have little merit.  I can put together a whole list of similar types of game scores for a lot of teams.

Just now, Voice of Reason said:

 Quibbling because one team beat another by 3 touchdowns instead of 4 or 5 is an exercise in futility. I am not much of a fan of score comparisons because weird things happen on a game by game basis. The potshots at Woodford County because they beat Campbell County 34 - 13 have have little merit.  I can put together a whole list of similar types of game scores for a lot of teams.

Oh I know you don't like score comparisons.  LOL.

Just now, theguru said:

Oh I know you don't like score comparisons.  LOL.

And this discussion is a good example of why they have little value on a one game basis. 

35 minutes ago, theguru said:

Same, if Woodford is that good this game should have been a running clock at the half. 

This game should have been a running clock, Woodford went for the 2 missed it, and then the wheels feel off a little in the 4th quarter where Campbell scored the 2 touchdowns off turnovers. 

2 minutes ago, WOFOJP61 said:

This game should have been a running clock, Woodford went for the 2 missed it, and then the wheels feel off a little in the 4th quarter where Campbell scored the 2 touchdowns off turnovers. 

Thank you.

How good is this Woodford team?

19 minutes ago, WOFOJP61 said:

This game should have been a running clock, Woodford went for the 2 missed it, and then the wheels feel off a little in the 4th quarter where Campbell scored the 2 touchdowns off turnovers. 

Thank you.

And that is more proof why using one game score as a statement on who a team has little value.

4 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Thank you.

And that is more proof why using one game score as a statement on who a team has little value.

Or you could ask yourself turnovers or not how was Campbell able to put two in the end zone like that against such a good team?

20 minutes ago, theguru said:

Or you could ask yourself turnovers or not how was Campbell able to put two in the end zone like that against such a good team?

They may have had reserves in that point on defense.

1 hour ago, Tigerallamerican said:

Glasgow is #2 in 3A RPI - CAL would run clock them in the 1st half. 

I’m glad you believe that. CAL didn’t run clock them in the first half last year matter of fact it was a game all the way to the end and if Glasgow hadn’t gave up three TDS on just horribly blown coverages they would’ve won last year because other than that CAL couldn’t move the ball. Glasgow virtually has the same team back this year and if you truly believe they will put a first half running clock on the Scotties you are going to be mightily disappointed if they get a chance to play.

46 minutes ago, theguru said:

Or you could ask yourself turnovers or not how was Campbell able to put two in the end zone like that against such a good team?

Uninspired first half from them after a long bus ride and then weather delay. They dominated Campbell in the second half.