November 1, 20178 yr Are you saying you believe that, if Georgia and Bama are undefeated heading to the SEC Championship game, the loser misses the playoffs? No freaking way that happens. If they undefeated going to Atlanta, barring some crazy lopsided beatdown, you can pencil both teams into the 4-Team Playoff. That was a head snapping reversal Mentsch!
November 1, 20178 yr I think UGA deserves the 1 spot but man... Did not think the committee would actually put UGA at 1 and Alabama at 2.
November 1, 20178 yr Only issue I have is Clemson. Sure a few good wins but a really bad loss. Whether it made a difference in the outcome I am not sure, but I think they probably considered the concussion the QB had against Syracuse.
November 1, 20178 yr Author Only issue I have is Clemson. Sure a few good wins but a really bad loss. Doesn't matter who you lose to, all about who you beat.
November 1, 20178 yr Author Whether it made a difference in the outcome, I think they probably considered the concussion the QB had against Syracuse. I agree.
November 1, 20178 yr Now if you're thinking is that Oklahoma and Notre Dame both lose another game then I think you have a case, but I still think Penn State jumps the loser as well. Why a one loss Notre Dame getting in before a close loss/one loss Georgia?? The one loss ND would have would be to Georgia, in South Bend at that!
November 1, 20178 yr Author Why a one loss Notre Dame getting in before a close loss/one loss Georgia?? The one loss ND would have would be to Georgia, in South Bend at that! You're assuming I think Alabama is going to beat Georgia, which I don't.
November 1, 20178 yr You're assuming I think Alabama is going to beat Georgia, which I don't. Because that would require you to set aside your deep seeded hatred for the Tide....:lol2:
November 1, 20178 yr Why a one loss Notre Dame getting in before a close loss/one loss Georgia?? The one loss ND would have would be to Georgia, in South Bend at that! I think Penn State is toast; unless they get a couple of 2 loss conf champs in the mix. Talk about a bad schedule.....their best win will probably be against an unranked Michigan team.
November 1, 20178 yr Author Because that would require you to set aside your deep seeded hatred for the Tide....:lol2: :lol2:
November 1, 20178 yr Author I think Penn State is toast; unless they get a couple of 2 loss conf champs in the mix. Talk about a bad schedule.....their best win will probably be against an unranked Michigan team. Assuming Penn State beats MSU this week I think Michigan will jump back into the top 25 riding the wave of hype surrounding Brandon Peters. A lot of Penn States ability is OSU winning out and Michigan beating Wisconsin.
November 1, 20178 yr Assuming Penn State beats MSU this week I think Michigan will jump back into the top 25 riding the wave of hype surrounding Brandon Peters. A lot of Penn States ability is OSU winning out and Michigan beating Wisconsin. MSU and Michigan are bad teams. They don't have a marquee game left to put them back in the conversation. They basically have to have OSU lose two conf games....good luck with that
November 1, 20178 yr You're assuming I think Alabama is going to beat Georgia, which I don't. No one runs the ball against Bama.....The only thing UGA does well is run the ball. Kirby Smart learned everything he knows about defense from Nick Saban; who most people would put in the top 5 college coaches of all time. Bama has better players and more depth than UGA. So you're saying because Jalen Hurts (in your opinion) can't throw the ball that UGA will beat Bama.....good luck with that one.
November 1, 20178 yr Author MSU and Michigan are bad teams. They don't have a marquee game left to put them back in the conversation. They basically have to have OSU lose two conf games....good luck with that I think their best bet is OSU winning out and the Big 10. I think the committee would rather see OSU/ PSU part 2 on a neutral site than they would Bama/ UGA part 2 in back to back games.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.