November 13, 20169 yr Don't look now, but here comes Oklahoma. Their loss to Houston may be too detrimental even if they finish undefeated in conference play.
November 13, 20169 yr Their loss to Houston may be too detrimental even if they finish undefeated in conference play.Anything can happen.
November 13, 20169 yr Anything can happen. True. I agree with what you said earlier about nothing being surprising at this point.
November 13, 20169 yr This is an interesting thought. The Big 10 may get 2 teams in the playoff and it won't be Ohio State and Michigan. Let's say Clemson loses another game that knocks them out. UofL jumps in. Bama is in. Ohio State if they beat Michigan is in, but they won't be the Big 10 Champion most likely. The Big 10 Champ game will be Penn State and Wisconsin. The winner of that game has a is competing with the PAC 12 winner and the BIG 12 winner. It would be hard to pick against Wisconsin or Penn State at this point. This is only applicable if Clemson loses another game because UofL would get in over Wisconsin/ Penn State.
November 13, 20169 yr 1. Bama 2. Ohio State 3. Clemson 4. UofL 5. Michigan 6. Washington I think UL will be ahead of Clemson for now. However Clemson will jump them after winning the ACC championship in a few weeks.
November 13, 20169 yr 7 teams in the top 25 lost this week. 5 in the top 10 and 4 of those 5 were to unranked teams.
November 13, 20169 yr I think UL will be ahead of Clemson for now. However Clemson will jump them after winning the ACC championship in a few weeks. I think UofL is a WAY better team than Clemson, but neither team has a really good win except for the head to head win Clemson has over UofL. I think the committee will find it hard to move UofL ahead simply because of this. I hope they do because I think UofL is REALLY good.
November 13, 20169 yr I think UofL is a WAY better team than Clemson, but neither team has a really good win except for the head to head win Clemson has over UofL. I think the committee will find it hard to move UofL ahead simply because of this. I hope they do because I think UofL is REALLY good. What loss looks better, U of L losing to a top 5 ranked Clemson or Clemson losing to an unranked Pitt team that came in and beat Clemson at home. Another thing to consider is that Ohio State and Michigan have yet to play and both have one loss for now. You won't find a two loss team in the top four, I don't care who they are. JMO.
November 13, 20169 yr Author What loss looks better, U of L losing to a top 5 ranked Clemson or Clemson losing to an unranked Pitt team that came in and beat Clemson at home. Another thing to consider is that Ohio State and Michigan have yet to play and both have one loss for now. You won't find a two loss team in the top four, I don't care who they are. JMO. Pitt is better than some think.
November 13, 20169 yr Pitt is better than some think. They're not a bad team by any stretch but all four of their losses still happened and they got absolutely pasted by a pretty mediocre Miami team just a week ago. It's not a good loss.
November 13, 20169 yr They're not a bad team by any stretch but all four of their losses still happened and they got absolutely pasted by a pretty mediocre Miami team just a week ago. It's not a good loss. Their defense is total garbage
November 13, 20169 yr I think Louisville stands no chance of getting in IF Clemson wins out. Two things factor into that !0 is obvious head to head 2) out of conference win over Auburn is better than any win Louisville has or will have against out of conference. Houston falling off the map killed Louisville. I believe they are going to have to pick up one out of conference game in the future against and upper tier team in the 5 major conferences. Maybe that have corrected that, I haven't seen their schedule in future years. Ohio State beating Oklahoma also helps them against Louisville. Louisville may be the 2nd best team in the nation, however, I just don't see them making it due to schedule mostly.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.