98NCCalum Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Anyone who is offended by this needs to get a life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 58 posts in (now 59) and I still have no clue what Clyde is getting at here.... Here's what the video was aiming to accomplish....Make every guy on Alabama's campus want to date a member of said sorority and make every girl on campus want to be a part of said sorority. I'd say they accomplished that goal in spades with about 99% of the student body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 You guys keep pointing out the obvious despite no one saying otherwise. I've yet to see anyone say all kids are equal in any way. I've also yet to see anyone say they are offended. Can we move past the obvious? Yes, no one was injured. Yes, they have the right to do the video. Yes, they have the right to be in clubs with whom they want. Yes, they are allowed to show they have fun. Yes, not all girls are pretty. Yes, life's not always fair. Any other truths we want to put out here just to say we said them? So what's the point of the thread then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Offended is in the eye of the beholder. Yes, I am speculating on some women being offended. The question was asked how this video objectifies women. I answered it. It does and many of the posts in here support that. I disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 58 posts in (now 59) and I still have no clue what Clyde is getting at here.... Here's what the video was aiming to accomplish....Make every guy on Alabama's campus want to date a member of said sorority and make every girl on campus want to be a part of said sorority. I'd say they accomplished that goal in spades with about 99% of the student body. I'm not trying to "get" at anything. It's silly, though, to argue that the person who suggested that this objectifies women was wrong. It's 100% objectification. To argue otherwise is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bugatti Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 So what's the point of the thread then? For Clyde to attempt to take a contrarian view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 I disagree Then what is your definition of "objectify?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 For Clyde to attempt to take a contrarian view. That's just second nature yet does nothing to disprove what I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 I disagree Same here. The video in no way, shape, or form objectifies women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 For Clyde to attempt to take a contrarian view. So you mean the same as all his other ~74K posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 So what's the point of the thread then? Why was it started? My guess is it was started since it's in the news and to take exception with the opinion piece linked to it. The lady writing the opinion piece said they reinforced stereotypes that women have been trying to overcome. Who can argue she's wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Same here. The video in no way, shape, or form objectifies women. Your definition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Your definition? This video does not make these women look like objects that are to be used however anyone pleases. When someone talks about objectifying someone else to me it means they're treated as property or objects to be used, and they're made to not be seen as actual people. This video did none of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 This video does not make these women look like objects that are to be used however anyone pleases. When someone talks about objectifying someone else to me it means they're treated as property or objects to be used, and they're made to not be seen as actual people. This video did none of that. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 This video does not make these women look like objects that are to be used however anyone pleases. When someone talks about objectifying someone else to me it means they're treated as property or objects to be used, and they're made to not be seen as actual people. This video did none of that. Then we have a different definition. By your definition how can one ever be objectified if "not seen as actual people" is the requirement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts