That's irrelevant in a criminal case. Don't think it was supported by department policy but I can't confirm for you right now.

but they are not accepted/banned, or whatever other word someone wants to use for a reason.

 

So your answer is no, it wasn't any fault of the police that he couldn't breath...

 

Again, even if their actions caused him harm (trouble breathing) it doesn't automatically mean their actions were criminal.

but they are not accepted/banned' date=' or whatever other word someone wants to use for a reason.[/quote']

 

I don't know for certain.

Again. I haven't paid attention to this case. But if the hold was banned by the NYPD, and the guy was being choked in this manner, why not let loose, and warn him that if he tired anything that he would be tazed or stunned?

 

I damn sure wouldn't put someone in a choke hold from behind...

 

Didn't answer my question but ok.

Again. I haven't paid attention to this case. But if the hold was banned by the NYPD' date=' and the guy was being choked in this manner, why not let loose, and warn him that if he tired anything that he would be tazed or stunned?[/quote']

 

Did any of the police have a taser?

 

I honestly don't know.

Didn't answer my question but ok.

 

I would follow my training, I would think.

 

Are they trained to use banned choke holds to subdue individuals?

So your answer is no, it wasn't any fault of the police that he couldn't breath...

 

I've watched that video 15 times, no I think his breathing problems were brought on by his actions with the police but I don't think a particular action caused his trouble breathing.

 

You see it 180degrees the other way, that's fine

#weregood

I would follow my training, I would think.

 

Are they trained to use banned choke holds to subdue individuals?

 

They are trained to use these, which DO NOT RESTRICT BREATHING.

 

 

In all honesty if your trying to take someone much bigger than you to the ground, how do you do it?

 

I would follow my training, I would think.

 

Are they trained to use banned choke holds to subdue individuals?

 

Violating policy doesn't mean he broke the law.

 

Do you think the officer wanted to kill this man?

Ridiculous. That guy has to be charged with something. Also saw that he's had multiple racial profiling/discrimination accusations.

 

This is why the black community has no faith in our system.

Violating policy doesn't mean he broke the law.

 

Do you think the officer wanted to kill this man?

 

I think he wanted to exert unnecessary force on the guy.

One challenge for the police is that two officers involved say the guy never looked like he was having any problems or that he was in distress. Said nothing looked serious.

 

Either they are lying or they are just lacking situational awareness. Neither are good in their profession.

One challenge for the police is that two officers involved say the guy never looked like he was having any problems or that he was in distress. Said nothing looked serious.

 

Either they are lying or they are just lacking situational awareness. Neither are good in their profession.

That's the biggest issue that I see also. That once he was cuffed what sense of urgency did they have about his care.

I think he wanted to exert unnecessary force on the guy.

 

Yep, every police officer in America wakes up every day hoping they can get into a fight and have an excuse to exert unnecessary force...:no: