ftbll4life Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 From all four cameras. http://Http://www.hudl.com/team/21224/highlights/89557857 What are your thoughts?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLCat Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Corbin fans claim it was a phantom facemask call to extend game followed by a pass that hit the ground to win it. Pretty clear that for all the criticism of the officials that they absolutely nailed both plays at the end of the game. Very clear horsecollar and facemask on the Hail Mary and very clear reception on the TD. Wow...Sportscenter worthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander 25 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Clearly a great call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawnboy13 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 WOW!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4chs Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Corbin fans claim it was a phantom facemask call to extend game followed by a pass that hit the ground to win it. Pretty clear that for all the criticism of the officials that they absolutely nailed both plays at the end of the game. Very clear horsecollar and facemask on the Hail Mary and very clear reception on the TD. Wow...Sportscenter worthy I have not heard or seen where any Corbin fan disputed that penalty. No one I talked to last night or today had a problem with either call. Where did you hear this? Please tell me.:popcorn: I could give you at least 5 or 6 heads scratching calls that occurred that all went Central's way that appeared to change the momentum of the game. The 2 plays on the final drive were not among them. It's irrelevant now, Central won and they move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLCat Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Your own post recapping the game says "a pass that may or may not have bounced off the ground"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLCat Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Never mind my post above. I see where you are referring to the penalty. You don't have to look hard on the internet to find Corbin fans (or "non-partial fans" at the game) questioning that call. To your point have not seen it on here though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatz Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 As spectacular as those two plays were, the key was the Penalty. Time ran out on the play (if I understand correctly) and that would have been the ball game. The defensive penalty allowed for an "untimed" down and the TD pass was thrown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JokersWild24 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Poor Corbin, always getting ripped off on their home field. Can't catch a break there. :idunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watusi Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I wonder why the video has been changed. In the original version, there were 4 views. Now there is only 3 views in the clip. The view from behind the offense, which really showed the facemask penalty, is now missing. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanofMany Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 I wonder why the video has been changed. In the original version, there were 4 views. Now there is only 3 views in the clip. The view from behind the offense, which really showed the facemask penalty, is now missing. Why? That could be as simple as someone checking/unchecking a box on Hudl. All 3 current videos show the penalty. Clearly tackled by the head. As for the catch in the endzone, it was low, could have touched the ground, but you don't see any of the Corbin players signaling no catch. I can't believe they have 4 cameras. Do they all run off on signal to start and stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 I wonder why the video has been changed. In the original version' date=' there were 4 views. Now there is only 3 views in the clip. The view from behind the offense, which really showed the facemask penalty, is now missing. Why?[/quote'] I saw nothing conclusive in the current videos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE18 Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 That could be as simple as someone checking/unchecking a box on Hudl. All 3 current videos show the penalty. Clearly tackled by the head. As for the catch in the endzone, it was low, could have touched the ground, but you don't see any of the Corbin players signaling no catch. I can't believe they have 4 cameras. Do they all run off on signal to start and stop? Two angles were from Corbin Cameras and two angles were from Central Cameras. The highlight was made and posted by Central Coaching staff so if it was edited it had to be done by the Central Coaching staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanofMany Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Two angles were from Corbin Cameras and two angles were from Central Cameras. The highlight was made and posted by Central Coaching staff so if it was edited it had to be done by the Central Coaching staff. not true. If the missing angle was shared by Corbin and then the sharing was discontinued it would be removed from the highlight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLCat Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 I wonder why the video has been changed. In the original version, there were 4 views. Now there is only 3 views in the clip. The view from behind the offense, which really showed the facemask penalty, is now missing. Why? That is a major mystery to me as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts