Keep dragging it out to hope the out of towners go home ? I couldnt care less if they protest their butts off, its their and everyone else's right .. but violence and stupidity and property destruction shouldnt be tolerated . If they protesters get out of hand , the authorities have every right to protect people's property .

Surprised Mtn Ref missed this one.

 

Muslim groups seek to co-opt Ferguson protests, says watchdog group | Fox News

Surprised Mtn Ref missed this one.

 

Muslim groups seek to co-opt Ferguson protests, says watchdog group | Fox News

 

 

No one's mentioning how the KKK is on the side of the officer either. Surprised anyone missed that one too.

 

Moral of the story -- undesirables are on both sides of the coin in this, as well as most all divisive issues like it.

 

To be clear: I'm not calling Muslims undesirable and know nothing about the group (in the Fox News article that I'm not interrupting the UK game to click), so I don't really know the cause, etc., just saying the mere fact that any one segment supports an issue doesn't mean the cause itself is lost.

 

No one's mentioning how the KKK is on the side of the officer either. Surprised anyone missed that one too.

 

Moral of the story -- undesirables are on both sides of the coin in this, as well as most all divisive issues like it.

 

To be clear: I'm not calling Muslims undesirable and know nothing about the group (in the Fox News article that I'm not interrupting the UK game to click), so I don't really know the cause, etc., just saying the mere fact that any one segment supports an issue doesn't mean the cause itself is lost.

 

Didn't the KKK leader come out and say that wasn't true?

Didn't the KKK leader come out and say that wasn't true?

and he doesn't know Mnt ref lol

Didn't the KKK leader come out and say that wasn't true?

 

So they're on Michael Brown's side?

 

So they're on Michael Brown's side?

 

No just that they weren't raising money for the Officer. I could be wrong though.

 

I don't think they have to pick a side do they?

So they're on Michael Brown's side?

 

:lol2:

No just that they weren't raising money for the Officer. I could be wrong though.

 

I don't think they have to pick a side do they?

 

 

Do they have to pick a side? Of course not. Do you honestly think they looked at this situation and said the cops are at fault? I have a hard time believing the KKK would choose the side of Michael Brown and the protestors and I have a hard time believing they haven't chosen a side.

 

I'm just being honest.

Not sure about you guys but I'm sure the racists rednecks are not the side of michael brown . Im on the side of whatever the truth is , and unless the facts show new Info , I can't get all worked up about this tradgic incident . You can't go beating on cops . Even when they are at fault , or seem unfair -- you dont assault a police officer .

Didn't the KKK leader come out and say that wasn't true?

 

I was thinking the Anonymous' OPKKK where they were hacking their pages and posting pictures of Klan members sans hoods was in direct response to their activities in Fergueson.

 

Obviously, I don't think that anyone who is supporting the officer is on the side of the KKK, I was just making the analogy that it's ridiculous for anyone to say that supporters on either side are "guilty by association" because there are extremists who share hopes for the same outcomes.

 

Honestly, I personally just hope that the right decision is made, regardless of whatever fear of backlash there is. If the officer is completely innocent, I hope that comes out and he's completely acquitted. If Michael Brown was completely innocent, then I hope that justice is served. Best way to put it, regardless of what side anyone is on, is that most people just want to see the right decision made (whatever that right decision may be).

I hope the DOJ doesnt force a guilty indictment to calm/keep the peace if the officer isnt guilty.

 

Im sure this administration isnt above something like this.

I hope the DOJ doesnt force a guilty indictment to calm/keep the peace if the officer isnt guilty.

 

Im sure this administration isnt above something like this.

 

 

Even if he was indicted it would only delay the uprest. I doubt a jury would convict Officer Wilson if the evidence we have all seen so far is factual.

No one's mentioning how the KKK is on the side of the officer either. Surprised anyone missed that one too.

 

Moral of the story -- undesirables are on both sides of the coin in this, as well as most all divisive issues like it.

 

To be clear: I'm not calling Muslims undesirable and know nothing about the group (in the Fox News article that I'm not interrupting the UK game to click), so I don't really know the cause, etc., just saying the mere fact that any one segment supports an issue doesn't mean the cause itself is lost.

 

Not talking about whose side somebody's on, only who will be there protesting with their own agenda. I haven't heard if the KKK will be there but it wouldn't surprise me.

 

Do they have to pick a side? Of course not. Do you honestly think they looked at this situation and said the cops are at fault? I have a hard time believing the KKK would choose the side of Michael Brown and the protestors and I have a hard time believing they haven't chosen a side.

 

I'm just being honest.

 

There's a difference in choosing a side and coming out in support publicly for someone. My only point was that I heard they denied doing any fundraisers for the Officer, which is why they were brought into the conversation anyways, if I'm not mistaken.