The last 3 years T's top may have been better but overall talent was equal. Was there a quick on the sidelines at x? No, but as a whole the talent was pretty much equal.

So our TOP? Let's say 4-5 D1 guys, were better than your top...but the rest was equal? Plus our coaching was way better? Likely still is......I'm good with that. Should make this year that much more fun.

So our TOP? Let's say 4-5 D1 guys, were better than your top...but the rest was equal? Plus our coaching was way better? Likely still is......I'm good with that. Should make this year that much more fun.

 

No, just your top player.

Check out the MaxPreps Thread started by All State Baseball at 9:42pm today.

 

Kentucky State Rankings - very unexpected

 

Honestly these pre-season rankings mean nothing.

The last 3 years T's top may have been better but overall talent was equal. Was there a quick on the sidelines at x? No, but as a whole the talent was pretty much equal.

 

AT. I know you have tiger stripped pajamas but to say this takes away from your usually credible posts. Trinity's level of play (players) over recent years has been head and shoulders and many points above everyone else including Poplar Level High School. It's OK to admit such... now that the major pain is over.

 

The talent pool appears far more even this year and I expect Trinity will not dominate. In fact, they could have a losing record for the first half of the season.

Honestly these pre-season rankings mean nothing.

 

I agree preseason means very little however that is the topic of this thread - Which team should be preseason #1.

 

Maxpreps comes out with their list and have Trinity 3rd and St X 5th - Not sure what/who they are listening to.

 

Tonight will help some when T plays HHS and X plays SK

AT. I know you have tiger stripped pajamas but to say this takes away from your usually credible posts. Trinity's level of play (players) over recent years has been head and shoulders and many points above everyone else including Poplar Level High School. It's OK to admit such... now that the major pain is over.

 

 

The talent pool appears far more even this year and I expect Trinity will not dominate. In fact, they could have a losing record for the first half of the season.

 

Their level of play no doubt. But I just don't believe besides quick and possibly hatcher the talent wasn't equal. Maybe we could start rattling some names off and I could be dispproven.

Their level of play no doubt. But I just don't believe besides quick and possibly hatcher the talent wasn't equal. Maybe we could start rattling some names off and I could be dispproven.

 

Until the past three years I thought X had the edge in talent. A strong edge in 09. In 11, Trinity had big edge. Last year, other than Quick, Hatcher and White it may have been close. It is hard to evaluate. How good would some of the X quarerbacks have been if they had been coached by Beatty, Coverdale and Brohm? We'll never know, but I suspect that at least a couple of them would have been very good.

Until the past three years I thought X had the edge in talent. A strong edge in 09. In 11, Trinity had big edge. Last year, other than Quick, Hatcher and White it may have been close. It is hard to evaluate. How good would some of the X quarerbacks have been if they had been coached by Beatty, Coverdale and Brohm? We'll never know, but I suspect that at least a couple of them would have been very good.

 

 

I agree, some of the dual threat guys they had would have been dangerous.

Until the past three years I thought X had the edge in talent. A strong edge in 09. In 11, Trinity had big edge. Last year, other than Quick, Hatcher and White it may have been close. It is hard to evaluate. How good would some of the X quarerbacks have been if they had been coached by Beatty, Coverdale and Brohm? We'll never know, but I suspect that at least a couple of them would have been very good.

 

Agree with the talent disparity in 09 an 11. But the last 2 years its a lot closer than the scores lead one to believe.

I agree preseason means very little however that is the topic of this thread - Which team should be preseason #1.

 

Maxpreps comes out with their list and have Trinity 3rd and St X 5th - Not sure what/who they are listening to.

 

Tonight will help some when T plays HHS and X plays SK

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe MaxPreps is more of a computer ranking system than individuals makeing decisions.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe MaxPreps is more of a computer ranking system than individuals makeing decisions.

 

You're right, although their super 25 or what ever its called is a human poll I believe.

Agree with the talent disparity in 09 an 11. But the last 2 years its a lot closer than the scores lead one to believe.

 

I am not trying to get on your math, but 2011 was in the last 2 years.

I am not trying to get on your math, but 2011 was in the last 2 years.

 

Lol it's been a long Friday. But watching this scrimmage and reading the T/H thread T deserves to be #1. X has the potential but offense isn't where it needs to be right now.

Lol it's been a long Friday. But watching this scrimmage and reading the T/H thread T deserves to be #1. X has the potential but offense isn't where it needs to be right now.

 

There you go with one of your good posts again! I think that is a fair assessment for August 16th... a long way to go before the Gridiron Bowl... it will be a fun season and I fully expect X and T to have a 3rd round playoff date in their future.

Neither one of them. BG should be #1 :ylsuper: