Baseballfan3

It is Derby weekend

It is in fact a backcourt violation when an inbounds pass it touched in frontcourt and subsequently possessed in backcourt. Unlike what has been said in this thread.

9.9.1 SITUATION D: Team A is awarded a throw-in near the division line. A1’s throw-in is deflected by B1; A2 jumps from Team A’s frontcourt, catches the ball in the air and lands in the backcourt. RULING: Backcourt violation on Team A. The throw-in ends when it is legally touched by B1. A2 gains player and team control in the air after having left the floor from Team A’s frontcourt, therefore having frontcourt status. As soon as A2 lands in the backcourt, he/she has committed a backcourt violation. The exception* granted during a throw-in ends when the throw-in ends and is only for the player making the initial touch on the ball (Rule 9-9-3). Straight from the case book.

Retracted statement

All Tell said he should be permanently barred from ever playing again. While I agree with that sentiment about the other 2. This guy just needs a couple game suspension. He acted in the head of the moment and shoved an official. It is bad and deserves punishment, but you can't compare this to the other in terms of how badly he should be punished. It is an apples vs. oranges scenario.

This one is not even close to on the same level of bad as the 2 that tackled the Umpire. This one is a heat of the moment shove, the other was premeditated.

One is doing the exact same job as the other. Neither one has more responsibilities than the other, therefore same pay.

1, you are basing your truths on hearsay. 2 Things in Owen County haven't changed in 30 years, why do you expect them to now?

That is correct sir.

Ball doesn't matter in this instance. Think about a fumble being picked up. The play does not stop because the ball is touching the ground in someones possession. It is only downed when a body part other than the hand or feet touch the ground.

No. Collins has all facilities of their own on campus

No I did. When you said poor decision BUT... you started justifying the player and coach's actions.

Why in the world would anyone EVER justify malicious actions such as this one by the coach catcher and pitcher. No matter where the prior pitch was(which the catcher pulled in and up at least 6 inches from where she caught it), it is never right to intentionally hit anyone, much less the umpire. Secondly, umpires are human too. Theyis pitches just like pitchers miss their spot, hitters miss on a swing or fielders no dot a ground ball. Doesn't mean they are intentionally doing so to screw one team or the other over.

No open jobs post yet? I know Gallatin Co is open

Incorrect. Able was batting where Charlie should have been since Baker wad legalized. Therefore Abel is nullified and Charlie called out since he was SUPPOSED to be up. Daniels is now up

Larry was recommended to take over by Fucci and administration listened

Guess you didn't see where I answered the question at hand now did you?

It does matter, as that is the technical term for the pole in the rules book.

Sorry but they are officially listed as foul line and foul pole. It is not nor has it ever been officially listed in any manner the fair pole

First of all, it's a foul pole. It isn't a fair line, therefore it isn't a fair pole. Secondly, you take everything into consideration and make an educated guess. It's about all I could see the umpires doing

I'm sure they cancelled due to not wanting to potentially only get one game in, giving an unfair advantage to the first game.

Good luck getting through Collins first, who btw beat SK with Lawrence on the hill 12-1

As he should. Don't save for 2nd round. It isnt guaranteed, just ask Oldham's coach Gerlach about saving Keikeffer(sp?) against Carroll a few years back.

You obviously don't realize how good Goe is.

Look to the Centerfield wall to figure out who the successor will be...