How a 5-3 Boone Co team that beat Male by 2Td's isn't in Male's #8 spot is mindboggling.

 

Can't disagree with that.

Maybe the fact that X's losses all come from the #1 teams in their divisions(and their states w/exception of bowling green). Also X was in every game they lost including Trinity which was 14-6 at halftime. Riverdale 10-3 at halftime. Bowling Green 14-7(X lead) at halftime and Moeller 14-0 at halftime. If X played Scott Co. today it would be 42-7(X)

 

Not this year, Scott County is using more kids and is not loosing strenght in the second half, I think these two teams would make an excellent match up and would like to see them play. Not saying Scott County would win just saying it would be a good game and SC would have a very fair chance of winning.

^ Until I see them do otherwise....I say X beats SC handily.

^ Until I see them do otherwise....I say X beats SC handily.

 

Because of our schedule I cant dispute what you say, I am just saying not the SC of old, I would like to see them play

Lets see how Male ends up in the playoffs.

 

0-1 or 1-1 at best. If they beat Meade Co./Central Hardin they get a rematch with X. I really mean no disrespect to Male because I do respect that they stepped up and played Trinity at all 3 levels, but Male this year is not Male of last year.

On the one hand X's losses have been to fantastic teams. On the other hand the only team they've beaten with a winning record was Manual, and many would say the Crimsons beat themselves. Regardless of WHOM X has lost to, when the #2 team in your highest division is 5-4 and arguably will finish the season 5-5, that division is not strong. That is no disrespect to X at all, but more a statement about the non-existent depth in 6A football in KY. The "wannabe"s in 6A that boast say, a 6-2 record, would have very little chance of beating X and next to no chance of beating T.

Well said sir.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the winner of tonight's game between Campbell and Boone County make the rankings.

OK. Litkenhaus has Butler #4 and Eastern #9. And yes, they have Boone #7 and Male #11

 

Cantrell has Butler #4 and Eastern #8 -- Male #13 and Boone #10.

 

I dont feel like our rankings of Butler and Eastern make the poll questionable. You can argue away on Male/Boone.

Your only argument for Male is them beating a ranked Butler and Eastern that is only ranked because the same voters that put Male in over Boone voted them that way.

It's a down year when your #2 team has only one win against a team with a winning record (and Manual didn't have their starting qb for most of the game).

 

In my opinion Motley is much more accurate then Lewis, just not as athletic. Lewis' first couple passes were hitting the dirt.

Because of our schedule I cant dispute what you say, I am just saying not the SC of old, I would like to see them play

 

same thing, UKFan said about simon kenton and X.

On the one hand X's losses have been to fantastic teams. On the other hand the only team they've beaten with a winning record was Manual, and many would say the Crimsons beat themselves. Regardless of WHOM X has lost to, when the #2 team in your highest division is 5-4 and arguably will finish the season 5-5, that division is not strong. That is no disrespect to X at all, but more a statement about the non-existent depth in 6A football in KY. The "wannabe"s in 6A that boast say, a 6-2 record, would have very little chance of beating X and next to no chance of beating T.

 

In that case go review all of X's losses, those games besides the trinity second half could also be viewed as X giving the game away