March 13, 201115 yr 1. Joe Lunardi isn't on the commitee and isn't always as right as everyone thinks. 2. Jay Bilas(who never ever picks Duke for anything) says Duke should be a 1 before Pitt and ND. Guess we'll see who is right at 6 pm. Next. Me and my 2 other Duke friends were talking today about how much he rips on Duke all the time :lol:
March 13, 201115 yr The NCAA will make Duke a #1 seed although they should not be. Next. Please state your reasons on why they should not be a number 1 seed.
March 13, 201115 yr The NCAA will make Duke a #1 seed although they should not be. Next. Please state your reasons on why they should not be a number 1 seed. Yes. Please state them.:popcorn:
March 13, 201115 yr I agree I do not like Duke but they way they won the conference tournament they should get the #1 seed over either Pitt or Notre Dame. Because if you look at resume Duke has 21 wins over the top 100rpi ND and Pitt only have 14 or 15. If you put two team from one conference that neither made it to the conference finals that would be setting a bad precedent in my opinion. IF they do they might as well have selection Sunday the week before the conference tournaments.
March 13, 201115 yr I hope they make Duke a 2 seed. I beg them to make Duke a 2 seed.:taz::taz::taz::taz::taz:
March 13, 201115 yr Please state your reasons on why they should not be a number 1 seed. Notre Dame and Pitt played a much tougher schedule than Duke. They both played more than twice as many teams in the top 25 RPI. Outside of North Carolina, Duke played in a very week conference. Are you convinced? I didn't think so.
March 13, 201115 yr I am. And the experts are too. Joe Lunardi just showed Ohio State, Kansas, Notre Dame, and Pittsburg, in that order. Duke was #5. Next. GT, what do you think about Lundardi?
March 13, 201115 yr Notre Dame and Pitt played a much tougher schedule than Duke. They both played more than twice as many teams in the top 25 RPI. Outside of North Carolina, Duke played in a very week conference. Are you convinced? I didn't think so. SOS Notre Dame - 20 Pittsburgh - 29 Duke - 31 This was before today's game. Sounds like you were dead on. By dead on, I mean not at all.
March 13, 201115 yr SOS This was before today's game. Sounds like you were dead on. By dead on, I mean not at all. Wins over RPI top 100 Duke 21 ND and Pitt 14 I think the committee will take a hard look at that.
March 13, 201115 yr SOS Notre Dame - 20 Pittsburgh - 29 Duke - 31 This was before today's game. Sounds like you were dead on. By dead on, I mean not at all. I was quoting Joe Lunardi. I hate Duke but if they deserved to be a #1 seed I would say so. I know they will be a #1 seed. I just think ND and Pitt are more deserving.
March 13, 201115 yr I was quoting Joe Lunardi. I hate Duke but if they deserved to be a #1 seed I would say so. I know they will be a #1 seed. I just think ND and Pitt are more deserving. The numbers are leaning more towards Duke deserving....that's what the statistics are saying.
March 13, 201115 yr I also in defense of Duke not being a #1 seed the ACC is weak and if Irving could play I think #1 seed hands down but if he is not going to play or the committee does not know then #2 because since he went down Duke has not had a quality road win. Edited March 13, 201115 yr by 16thBBall Fan
March 13, 201115 yr Me and my 2 other Duke friends were talking today about how much he rips on Duke all the time :lol: He really does... almost to the point of being annoying.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.