CincySportsFan Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefootball/story/Big-Ten-Conference-divisions-named-Leaders-and-Legends-121310?gt1=39002 Got to say I don't mind the "Legends" division...but "Leaders"??? Also, the new logo isn't making me jump up and down either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMPERFIFALCON Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 "Legends" and "leaders" seems a little weird to me, almost like a pee wee football division name... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincySportsFan Posted December 13, 2010 Author Share Posted December 13, 2010 It was almost impossible to do it geographically (North-South or East-West). Figured they wouldn't do something along the lines of American-National. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bugatti Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 "Legends" and "leaders" seems a little weird to me, almost like a pee wee football division name... Legends is fine. Leaders is just stupid. And that logo, what the heck is that? I was expecting something flashy and I think they just used some text effect stuff in Microsoft Word to generate that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gchs_uk9 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 It was almost impossible to do it geographically (North-South or East-West). Figured they wouldn't do something along the lines of American-National. Why? It seemed like a west division of Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Northwestern, and Nebraska along with an east division of Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, Purdue, Ohio State, and Penn State would have worked just fine. Iowa, Wisconsin, and Nebraska are the big names in one, while Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State are the big names in the other. But instead they will have confusion over divisions (just like the ACC) from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobaar Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Laughable, just like most everything else about the Big10, errr... 11..... err 12?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincySportsFan Posted December 14, 2010 Author Share Posted December 14, 2010 Why? It seemed like a west division of Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Northwestern, and Nebraska along with an east division of Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, Purdue, Ohio State, and Penn State would have worked just fine. Iowa, Wisconsin, and Nebraska are the big names in one, while Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State are the big names in the other. But instead they will have confusion over divisions (just like the ACC) from now on. What I was saying was that based upon the divisions that they had already created, it'd be hard to assign a designation according to geography. It wouldn't seem right for Wisconsin to be in an "East" division (because of Penn State, Ohio State, etc.)...or have Michigan in the "West" (because of Nebraska, Iowa, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcpapa Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Sounds dorky to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gchs_uk9 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 What I was saying was that based upon the divisions that they had already created, it'd be hard to assign a designation according to geography. It wouldn't seem right for Wisconsin to be in an "East" division (because of Penn State, Ohio State, etc.)...or have Michigan in the "West" (because of Nebraska, Iowa, etc.) I actually understood after I had posted but it was too late to edit. Sorry about that CSF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucki Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Doesn't matter what you call them. Just make sure there is room for Ohio State's name on the trophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincySportsFan Posted December 14, 2010 Author Share Posted December 14, 2010 Sounds dorky to me. Won't necessarily argue with you there MC. But, curious...what other alternatives should have been considered...especially considering the fact that the divisions themselves were already aligned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincySportsFan Posted December 14, 2010 Author Share Posted December 14, 2010 Doesn't matter what you call them. Just make sure there is room for Ohio State's name on the trophy. :thumb::thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letabrotherspeak Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Simply awful. Way off topic, but I heard a snippet of a Joe Paterno radio interview from the weekend with a Pennsylvania radio station. It was sad to hear and incredulous at the same time. He couldn't hear what the guy on the radio was saying... I would think he is close to stepping down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Simply awful. Way off topic, but I heard a snippet of a Joe Paterno radio interview from the weekend with a Pennsylvania radio station. It was sad to hear and incredulous at the same time. He couldn't hear what the guy on the radio was saying... I would think he is close to stepping down. It was actually a Tampa radio station. It was so bad it almost seemed like a joke but you knew it wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts