October 3, 200917 yr No, it wasn't Lee Corso. Turns out most of them were taped in Nashville STORY LINK
October 3, 200917 yr Arrested or not, the man was a hero to millions of male internet viewers . . . . Kidding - obviously.
October 3, 200917 yr The best punishment for him would be in a room with her and his hands tied behind his back.
October 3, 200917 yr The best punishment for him would be in a room with her and his hands tied behind his back. That would be punishment? Sign me up.
October 4, 200917 yr The best punishment for him would be in a room with her and his hands tied behind his back. That doesn't sound like punishment to me.
October 4, 200917 yr Idiot From the article: The FBI learned that Barrett checked into the same hotel at that time and asked for a room adjacent to Andrews using his home address to register for the room. According to a criminal complaint, Barrett tried to sell the videos to celebrity gossip Web site TMZ.com. Employees at the Web site also helped in the investigation providing Barrett's information to Andrews' attorney.
October 4, 200917 yr Idiot From the article: The FBI learned that Barrett checked into the same hotel at that time and asked for a room adjacent to Andrews using his home address to register for the room. According to a criminal complaint, Barrett tried to sell the videos to celebrity gossip Web site TMZ.com. Employees at the Web site also helped in the investigation providing Barrett's information to Andrews' attorney. So its not a red flag for the hotel staff when people ask to room next to celebs? I wonder if he actually asked using her name or did he already know she was there?
October 5, 200917 yr So its not a red flag for the hotel staff when people ask to room next to celebs? I wonder if he actually asked using her name or did he already know she was there? The report indicated he asked based of her name. It also talked about how in both hotels where she was filmed that the peep hole had been tampered with. Seems like that would have to have been performed by someone inside the hotel.
October 5, 200917 yr That doesn't sound like punishment to me. You all have never faced the wrath of an angry woman. She gets alone with him and has his arms tied behind him... things that come to mind, black eyes, toothless, high heels to the groin area. A lot of things that the military can't do interrogating POW's.
October 5, 200917 yr You all have never faced the wrath of an angry woman. She gets alone with him and has his arms tied behind him... things that come to mind, black eyes, toothless, high heels to the groin area. A lot of things that the military can't do interrogating POW's. Have you?
October 5, 200917 yr The report indicated he asked based of her name. It also talked about how in both hotels where she was filmed that the peep hole had been tampered with. Seems like that would have to have been performed by someone inside the hotel. I just don't understand a hotel not finding this request odd (requesting a room next to her). I can see how he could have gotten away with tampering with the peep hole and not being noticed. Dress someone up like they work for the hotel...who's really going to question? I am glad they caught him. I would love to see Erin get a hold this guy. If it was me I would kick the living crap out of him. :madman::madman::madman:
October 5, 200917 yr I just don't understand a hotel not finding this request odd (requesting a room next to her). I can see how he could have gotten away with tampering with the peep hole and not being noticed. Dress someone up like they work for the hotel...who's really going to question? I am glad they caught him. I would love to see Erin get a hold this guy. If it was me I would kick the living crap out of him. :madman::madman::madman: This was a HUGE, HUGE, HUGE hotel no-no on so many levels. First, celebrities are rarely registered under their own name. Secondly, when celebrities arrive, their travel managers are very specific in their arrangements, including room assignments. A hotel staff member should never have taken it upon themselves to grant such a request. It is a two-fold issue. One, they most likely overrode a specific assingment, and secondly, by granting the request, they were admitting that Ms. Andrews was a guest of the hotel, which is a privacy issue. From industry newsletters that I subscribe to, this has huge ramifications for the hotel.
October 5, 200917 yr This was a HUGE, HUGE, HUGE hotel no-no on so many levels. First, celebrities are rarely registered under their own name. Secondly, when celebrities arrive, their travel managers are very specific in their arrangements, including room assignments. A hotel staff member should never have taken it upon themselves to grant such a request. It is a two-fold issue. One, they most likely overrode a specific assingment, and secondly, by granting the request, they were admitting that Ms. Andrews was a guest of the hotel, which is a privacy issue. From industry newsletters that I subscribe to, this has huge ramifications for the hotel. YEAH...what she said!! You go sista! :ylsuper::ylsuper::ylsuper:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.