August 28, 200917 yr Republican/ Conservative Philosophy ( Teach a man to fish ? Heck no I dont have time , besides if I taught you to fish you might catch more than me and I can't have that .
August 28, 200917 yr Conservative Philosophy - We can't teach them to fish, because that takes money to train teachers and we don't want to pay teachers because they join unions, plus the WON'T teach them to pray before they eat their fish.
August 28, 200917 yr Riiiiiighhht. If you care about those with less/no fish, hoopboy, get out there & TEACH them to fish. (don't just keep handing them fish) If you are one of those with less/no fish, hoopboy, get out there & learn/start to fish. NO ONE is stopping you, except you. [but if you ARE going to give out fish, at least be generous with YOUR OWN dang money] What I'm saying is, Republicans don't care at all about those with little to no fish. They'll give it to those with a massive boat load of fish to begin with and hope the leftover will "trickle down" to them. They do nothing to help, they only seemingly want to hurt the poor. And for that matter, why are we talking so much about fish again.
August 28, 200917 yr Liberal/Democrat Philosophy - why should I learn to fish when I can just sit on my butt and take fish from those who are already successful at catching fish. This is fun.
August 28, 200917 yr Did you come up with that on your own or get it straight out of Democrats for Dummies? I'm hurt, saddened, and embarrassed that you would call me a dummy.
August 28, 200917 yr Republican philosophy - The poor will eventually starve, because we take all their fish. At least we'll have plenty of space to kill deer.
August 28, 200917 yr What I'm saying is, Republicans don't care at all about those with little to no fish. They'll give it to those with a massive boat load of fish to begin with and hope the leftover will "trickle down" to them. They do nothing to help, they only seemingly want to hurt the poor. And for that matter, why are we talking so much about fish again.And you honestly think Democrats care about the poor? A politician is a politician and you can't polish a turd.
August 28, 200917 yr What I'm saying is, Republicans don't care at all about those with little to no fish. They'll give it to those with a massive boat load of fish to begin with and hope the leftover will "trickle down" to them. They do nothing to help, they only seemingly want to hurt the poor. And for that matter, why are we talking so much about fish again. Actually, based on studies the Republicans would give much more of their own fish than the democrats would to the poor fishless masses.
August 28, 200917 yr And you honestly think Democrats care about the poor? A politician is a politician and you can't polish a turd. It matters not if they care about the poor, they help them out, which is more than what Republicans do.
August 28, 200917 yr Actually, based on studies the Republicans would give much more of their own fish than the democrats would to the poor fishless masses. :laugh::laugh: Thanks, I needed that today.
August 28, 200917 yr It matters not if they care about the poor, they help them out, which is more than what Republicans do. "THEY" help them out? How is that? I'm not a dem. so can I abstain from funding entiltements?
August 28, 200917 yr Republican/ Conservative Philosophy ( Teach a man to fish ? Heck no I don't have time , besides if I taught you to fish you might catch more than me and I can't have that . And besides any fish caught by a republican in a Republican controled stream probably would be in-edible because of all the pollution .
August 28, 200917 yr Actually, based on studies the Republicans would give much more of their own fish than the democrats would to the poor fishless masses. :laugh::laugh: Thanks, I needed that today.It's true, the study has been done. Conservatives give more to charity than liberals.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.