August 20, 200917 yr Author This is my non-researched, off-the-cuff call: AFC Buffalo Pittsburgh Tennessee San Diego WC - KC, New England NFC Dallas Minnesota Atlanta Arizona WC - NYG, Philly SB - Pittsburgh over Philly Defensive POY - Lawrence Timmons MVP - Donovan McNabb ROY - Knowshon Moreno Buffalo? Interesting pick. Hard to argue with the rest. I think Pittsburgh has the talent to get back, I don't think they will repeat.
August 20, 200917 yr Buffalo? Interesting pick. Hard to argue with the rest. I think Pittsburgh has the talent to get back, I don't think they will repeat. As I said, it's off-the-cuff. Somebody comes out of nowhere every year, so why not Buffalo and KC?
August 20, 200917 yr Author As I said, it's off-the-cuff. Somebody comes out of nowhere every year, so why not Buffalo and KC? True. T.O. usually does well in season 1 too. Not sure about KC...i'm reading Cassell is struggling now. I'm ready for it to all get started.
August 20, 200917 yr Cowboys? They haven't won a playoff game in 10 years:lol: In relation to my point, how many playoff games has the Vikings won in the last ten years? I hate the cowboys, but I cant ignore their talent.
August 20, 200917 yr Buffalo? Interesting pick. Hard to argue with the rest. I think Pittsburgh has the talent to get back, I don't think they will repeat. I don't think it's hard to argue with Dallas winning the NFC East. They added virtually nothing significant to their roster that I can think of right off...I don't see them over taking Philly or the G-Men.
August 21, 200917 yr Author I don't think it's hard to argue with Dallas winning the NFC East. They added virtually nothing significant to their roster that I can think of right off...I don't see them over taking Philly or the G-Men. I think it is a simple case of addition by subtraction. T.O., Pacman, and Tank gone = better TEAM IMO.
August 21, 200917 yr I think it is a simple case of addition by subtraction. T.O., Pacman, and Tank gone = better TEAM IMO. Maybe, but I guess we'll see. I don't think Romo has what it takes to lead them very far though.
August 21, 200917 yr I think it is a simple case of addition by subtraction. T.O., Pacman, and Tank gone = better TEAM IMO. I tend to agree with this. Dallas is strong however you look at it. My original post seems to be misinterpreted by many. What I was stating is the NFC East is brutal. Im not sure who comes out of there, and neither is anyone else that are not homers. This gives the illusion of a greater strength to Minnesota since the division is much weaker. I am not convinced that Minnesota wins the North, Chicago has potential and GB is a darkhorse. With this being said, I believe the winner of the NFC North will be chasing the NFC East champion and it will be a major surprise if the NFC representative is not from the East to me.
August 22, 200917 yr Maybe, but I guess we'll see. I don't think Romo has what it takes to lead them very far though. He's proven he can lead them through 16 games.
August 22, 200917 yr This is my non-researched, off-the-cuff call: AFC Buffalo Pittsburgh Tennessee San Diego WC - KC, New England NFC Dallas Minnesota Atlanta Arizona WC - NYG, Philly SB - Pittsburgh over Philly Defensive POY - Lawrence Timmons MVP - Donovan McNabb ROY - Knowshon Moreno I like the pick. He has so much talent. He reminds me of Bell that we had early this decade with his ablity to rush the QB up the middle.
August 22, 200917 yr Cowboys? They haven't won a playoff game in 10 years:lol: the streak is at 13 now... :lol:
November 9, 200916 yr Author At this point, I have all 4 NFC teams correct. G-Men started out way hot and now can't find a win. Cowboys seem to be finding their stride. AFC, I'm only 1 out of 4 though.
December 1, 200916 yr ttt. Good stuff:lol: The NFL is just too easy to predict...never any surprises...:idunno::lol:
December 1, 200916 yr The NFL is just too easy to predict...never any surprises...:idunno::lol: :thumb::lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.