HHSDad Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Do you really believe that stuff? Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyrostek Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I have my opinion of what will be the outcome of Obamunism in this country. I'm quite sure that many would agree and many would not. However, one fact is certain and that is that the country is more polarized than ever and the divide will only widen with time. Some like to say that Obama wants to unite the country. I don't believe that is remotely the case. His attitude to date is "my way or the highway". Many of us, if required to do so, will choose the highway and we'll take our assets with us. Need an example of his divisive tactics? His "representatives" have floated four names-the latest being Caroline Kennedy- to be ambassador to The Holy See (The Vatican). All four were Catholics as one would expect. However, all four were pro-abortion and pro-stem cell. Obviously, Pope Benedict rejected all of them. Is Obama really that stupid or is he trying to send a message? He isn't stupid so it must be the latter. If he really wanted to "heal" the country and the world he would obviously name a pro-life Catholic to be ambassador as has been the case in the past. He may as well do so because, if he wants a confrontation with the Pope, he will certainly lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I'm just throwing out a warning for y'all. I was hoping that the blind followers of Barack would take off their rose colored glasses sooner than the Bush crowd did. But hey, I can make a living in a bankrupt, socialist nation. You'll still have to pay taxes and LOTS of them. I wasn't aware that the Bush crowd ever took their blinders off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I've personally believed this since 9/11 but it's funny how many seemed to not mind until a new "sheriff" came to town. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owsleyking Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Guys, we all need to take a step back and be more politically correct. They are not terrorists. They're disaster engineers. :laugh::laugh:We cannot call them criminals,either. They are ethically challenged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlbdonn Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This reminds me of a saying that was thrown at me a number of times when I espoused some of my political thoughts when I was a youth . It is still apropos in todays political atmosphere " America Love It or Leave It " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyrostek Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 This reminds me of a saying that was thrown at me a number of times when I espoused some of my political thoughts when I was a youth . It is still apropos in todays political atmosphere " America Love It or Leave It " Not really. The ones who would be leaving now are the ones who pay all the taxes to keep the country afloat. That certainly was not the case in your day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bballfamily Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 I bet you heard that on NPR....I consider myself liberal I classify people as terrorist who use violence against innocent people as a means to and end. That doesn't discriminate on the basis of race, nationality, religion, geographic location or even the nobility of the cause. So at least in my case your talk shows are wrong. I never listen to NPR. Because of your 1st statement is incorrect, I am not sure what to make of the rest of your comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bballfamily Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 Really? Which liberals don't consider the 19 men that hijacked planes on 9/11 to be terrorists? The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters. I'll be honest, the first time I've heard this term is right here in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 My boy Glenn Beck sure has tried to turn this document into a big issue (as always). He told the fine folks in San Antonio that they were terrorists according to the DHS. He's such a blowhard. Have I mentioned that before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters. The DHS Secretary was quoted in an interview in Germany saying she doesn't like the word "terrorism." She prefers "man caused disaster." While she did not say it in response to 9.11 my guess is that she may respond with such nuance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 The DHS Secretary was quoted in an interview in Germany saying she doesn't like the word "terrorism." She prefers "man caused disaster." While she did not say it in response to 9.11 my guess is that she may respond with such nuance. Thus my contention that we are now supposed to refer to them as Disaster Engineers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 Saw a report tonight that this lady said that returning veterans could be domestic terrorists threats. Did she really say this???? If so, she should be immediately terminated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 My boy Glenn Beck sure has tried to turn this document into a big issue (as always). He told the fine folks in San Antonio that they were terrorists according to the DHS. He's such a blowhard. Have I mentioned that before? The first 1-2 times that I watched him, I thought he was okay. But since then, I cannot stomach him and put him right there with Hannity and Olberman of who I cannot watch. Maddow is quickly becoming the foursome in that group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts