April 16, 200917 yr I have my opinion of what will be the outcome of Obamunism in this country. I'm quite sure that many would agree and many would not. However, one fact is certain and that is that the country is more polarized than ever and the divide will only widen with time. Some like to say that Obama wants to unite the country. I don't believe that is remotely the case. His attitude to date is "my way or the highway". Many of us, if required to do so, will choose the highway and we'll take our assets with us. Need an example of his divisive tactics? His "representatives" have floated four names-the latest being Caroline Kennedy- to be ambassador to The Holy See (The Vatican). All four were Catholics as one would expect. However, all four were pro-abortion and pro-stem cell. Obviously, Pope Benedict rejected all of them. Is Obama really that stupid or is he trying to send a message? He isn't stupid so it must be the latter. If he really wanted to "heal" the country and the world he would obviously name a pro-life Catholic to be ambassador as has been the case in the past. He may as well do so because, if he wants a confrontation with the Pope, he will certainly lose.
April 16, 200917 yr I'm just throwing out a warning for y'all. I was hoping that the blind followers of Barack would take off their rose colored glasses sooner than the Bush crowd did. But hey, I can make a living in a bankrupt, socialist nation. You'll still have to pay taxes and LOTS of them. I wasn't aware that the Bush crowd ever took their blinders off...
April 16, 200917 yr I've personally believed this since 9/11 but it's funny how many seemed to not mind until a new "sheriff" came to town. :thumb:
April 16, 200917 yr Guys, we all need to take a step back and be more politically correct. They are not terrorists. They're disaster engineers. :laugh::laugh:We cannot call them criminals,either. They are ethically challenged.
April 16, 200917 yr This reminds me of a saying that was thrown at me a number of times when I espoused some of my political thoughts when I was a youth . It is still apropos in todays political atmosphere " America Love It or Leave It "
April 16, 200917 yr This reminds me of a saying that was thrown at me a number of times when I espoused some of my political thoughts when I was a youth . It is still apropos in todays political atmosphere " America Love It or Leave It " Not really. The ones who would be leaving now are the ones who pay all the taxes to keep the country afloat. That certainly was not the case in your day.
April 17, 200917 yr I bet you heard that on NPR....I consider myself liberal I classify people as terrorist who use violence against innocent people as a means to and end. That doesn't discriminate on the basis of race, nationality, religion, geographic location or even the nobility of the cause. So at least in my case your talk shows are wrong. I never listen to NPR. Because of your 1st statement is incorrect, I am not sure what to make of the rest of your comment.
April 17, 200917 yr Really? Which liberals don't consider the 19 men that hijacked planes on 9/11 to be terrorists? The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters.
April 17, 200917 yr The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters. I'll be honest, the first time I've heard this term is right here in this thread.
April 17, 200917 yr My boy Glenn Beck sure has tried to turn this document into a big issue (as always). He told the fine folks in San Antonio that they were terrorists according to the DHS. He's such a blowhard. Have I mentioned that before?
April 17, 200917 yr The ones who now refer to these acts as man made disaters. The DHS Secretary was quoted in an interview in Germany saying she doesn't like the word "terrorism." She prefers "man caused disaster." While she did not say it in response to 9.11 my guess is that she may respond with such nuance.
April 17, 200917 yr The DHS Secretary was quoted in an interview in Germany saying she doesn't like the word "terrorism." She prefers "man caused disaster." While she did not say it in response to 9.11 my guess is that she may respond with such nuance. Thus my contention that we are now supposed to refer to them as Disaster Engineers...
April 17, 200917 yr Saw a report tonight that this lady said that returning veterans could be domestic terrorists threats. Did she really say this???? If so, she should be immediately terminated.
April 17, 200917 yr My boy Glenn Beck sure has tried to turn this document into a big issue (as always). He told the fine folks in San Antonio that they were terrorists according to the DHS. He's such a blowhard. Have I mentioned that before? The first 1-2 times that I watched him, I thought he was okay. But since then, I cannot stomach him and put him right there with Hannity and Olberman of who I cannot watch. Maddow is quickly becoming the foursome in that group.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.