I think that was changed. I recall someone tell me that it was no longer allowed. Not sure, but overall either way the refs did fine.

 

It was not changed in high school.

Not a factor in the game. They let both teams hack, push and hold and made some interesting calls both ways. We got used to it. No big deal in my opinion.

 

Bad calls were made both ways, no question. I'm not saying they decided the outcome by any means. I was just surprised not to see anybody complaining about it yet.

I would like to see the replay of the timeout they gave Holmes down on the baseline. The kid obviously travelled before calling timeout, but was he standing out of bounds when he signaled the timeout? :confused:

 

Yeah, he didn't have control, and it looked as though he was out of bounds. I also was under the impression that you can't call timeout going out of bounds like that...heard they changed that rule.

But then again earlier in the game, Cotton didn't have control and looked like he traveled when calling a TO near half court.

Up by three

Almost the final shot

 

The final shot

Victory

It was not changed in high school.

 

Hmm, there were a couple of HS games I watched this year, where kids did that and the TO was not awarded because they were going out of bounds. I guess it's different for each ref then.

Yeah, he didn't have control, and it looked as though he was out of bounds. I also was under the impression that you can't call timeout going out of bounds like that...heard they changed that rule.

But then again earlier in the game, Cotton didn't have control and looked like he traveled when calling a TO near half court.

 

:thumb::thumb::thumb:

, Cotton didn't have control and looked like he traveled when calling a TO near half court.

 

Why did you think that was a travel?

Hmm, there were a couple of HS games I watched this year, where kids did that and the TO was not awarded because they were going out of bounds. I guess it's different for each ref then.

 

Those refs blew it then.

 

No such rule in the high school rule book.

 

I believe the NCAA doesn't allow it.

I also thought that letting the kid come down the court and take a three, basically uncontested, or little contested, was a risk by Holmes. It would have only tied the game, yes...but he dribbled down the court and actually could have even come in closer a bit, and if he had, he probably would have nailed it.

Up by three

[ATTACH]27219[/ATTACH]

Almost the final shot

[ATTACH]27220[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]27221[/ATTACH]

The final shot

[ATTACH]27222[/ATTACH]

Victory

[ATTACH]27223[/ATTACH]

 

paNDA, hope you go to state. :notworthy:

Why did you think that was a travel?

 

Because, if he didn't have control of the ball he couldn't call the TO right? But if he DID have control, then he moved an awffffuuulll lot to not be called a travel. Tough call to make, but it has to be one or the other.

A few highlights from the game:

 

 

http://wlwt.highschoolplaybook.com/media/ShowMedia.do?mid=cafbf9a5b65bb6104e57dde88d1997ea

Those refs blew it then.

 

No such rule in the high school rule book.

 

I believe the NCAA doesn't allow it.

 

I mainly attended CovCath games, and it was in those games I saw it. But I guess they blew it then lol, just going by what I heard.

 

 

 

 

Just uploaded our broadcast and pictures.

 

Here is the link

 

Enjoy!!