December 3, 200817 yr Money was not an issue at Notre Dame. I don't think we can say that with 100% certainty. If you're saying they could have found the money in the boosters' pockets, I can agree with that. However, I believe the school President would not allow that much money to be raised to simply fire a football coach.
December 3, 200817 yr Author On this one unless your source was the school President all else was pure speculation. From the talk not even the AD had any say in it. My source was someone that makes a ton of money covering ND that called to give us a simple heads up on things so we could be ready with BK. He was wrong. It happens...
December 3, 200817 yr Atleast Weis is recruiting... And yet he's still not winning, and when he did it was with Ty's players....
December 3, 200817 yr I wouldn't give Ty a whole lot of credit. He already destroyed another program since his tenure at ND.
December 3, 200817 yr 1. We don't know what the issue was, personally I don'y think ND wanted to pay him the buy out.. 2. This is a joke Ty never got any chances like this.. 3. Yeah, he's recruiting, but those players havent shown any major productivity.
December 3, 200817 yr This is great news for people that despise ND. People like me . . . . Keep him there forever I say.
December 3, 200817 yr Yea, Notre Dame should have gave Ty more chances. :lol: As someone else already said he has gone ahead and destroyed another program already. Weis might not be the answer, but how anyone can argue that Notre Dame should have given Ty more time is a joke.
December 3, 200817 yr Weis just needs ONE MORE year. I guess this is great news for Cincinnati fans. They don't have to worry about Kelly leaving just yet. It's even better news for a majority of people on Notre Dame's schedule, gives you that extra bye week during the season. :lol:
December 3, 200817 yr If only they would have given Ty this many chances....What a joke. You can't be serious with this. Ty Willingham is a bad football coach. How many wins does Washington have under him?
December 3, 200817 yr You can't be serious with this. Ty Willingham is a bad football coach. How many wins does Washington have under him?Here are his totals: 44–36–1 · Stanford 21-15 · Notre Dame 11-36 · Washington
December 3, 200817 yr My source was someone that makes a ton of money covering ND that called to give us a simple heads up on things so we could be ready with BK. He was wrong. It happens... He may be very solid. On this one, though, I don't think it ran through the normal channels.
December 3, 200817 yr Author He may be very solid. On this one, though, I don't think it ran through the normal channels. He didn't run with it on his own outlet... :lol:
December 3, 200817 yr I wouldn't give Ty a whole lot of credit. He already destroyed another program since his tenure at ND. U-Dub went into the crapper long before Willingham got there. They really haven't been all that relevant since Don James' days.
December 3, 200817 yr U-Dub went into the crapper long before Willingham got there. They really haven't been all that relevant since Don James' days. If they were in the crapper when Ty arrived, then he took them out to the sewage plant. How Ty ever got hired at ND to begin with is a joke. When he won the Pac-10 at Stanford, it was before Pete Carroll got going and the conference was as bad as it had ever been.
December 3, 200817 yr IMO, the reason for keeping him around another year is that they'll have a better shot at Meyer after next football season instead of this football season.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.