February 26, 200818 yr So, is going from solid to good worth losing a day and running the risk of a rebuilding team playing Norfolk State. If it was a returning senior-laden team, then the decision holds less merit. But at this point, how good is UK going to be? That is an unknown and as an AD you don't want to put a possible stumbling block in front of your football coach. Let's say that Mitch never expressed any concern and a rebuilding UK loses to UL and then loses to Norfolk State. Imagine the cries for Mitch's job for agreeing to that scheduling mess if that was to occur? As was pointed out yesterday, how many years in a row does UK get to claim they have a "young team"???
February 26, 200818 yr As was pointed out yesterday, how many years in a row does UK get to claim they have a "young team"??? Whether they claim it or not, they do next year. At least on the offensive side.
February 26, 200818 yr It's as simple as this IMO. UK wants no part of playing UL on big stage national TV. Just say it, and move on...
February 26, 200818 yr Author So, is going from solid to good worth losing a day and running the risk of a rebuilding team playing Norfolk State. If it was a returning senior-laden team, then the decision holds less merit. But at this point, how good is UK going to be? That is an unknown and as an AD you don't want to put a possible stumbling block in front of your football coach. Then why wouldn't he want an extra day to get ready for Louisville.
February 26, 200818 yr It's as simple as this IMO. UK wants no part of playing UL on big stage national TV. Just say it, and move on... I would say that they want to play UL on a big stage national TV on their terms. And isn't that part of the AD's job?
February 26, 200818 yr Then why wouldn't he want an extra day to get ready for Louisville. Wouldn't he have already gotten that with going from a Saturday game to a Sunday game? Having 8 days to prepare for UL is not as vital as only having 4 days to prepare for Norfolk State. Surely you would agree that there is a big difference between 8 days and 4 days.
February 26, 200818 yr I would say that they want to play UL on a big stage national TV on their terms. Right. ESPN Classic is on regular rotation in tens of homes nationwide...
February 26, 200818 yr Right. ESPN Classic is on regular rotation in tens of homes nationwide... I have it on Direct TV. I can roll my eyes like a teenager too.:sssh::lol:
February 26, 200818 yr I have it on Direct TV. When was the last time you watch the channel? And how about a real answer and not the teenager variety??? :thumb:
February 26, 200818 yr As a UK fan, it overjoys me to see the grief this is causing everyone else. I heard on the radio that ESPN would still broadcast the game on Sunday. Is this not correct? If it is, whats the big deal? Why would Louisville schedule the Ironman to go right by the stadium on a day they had a home football game scheduled? Everybody likes to whine about UK moving the football game back this year, but nobody mentions that UofL moved the basketball game back this year as well. You guys are too funny.
February 26, 200818 yr As a UK fan, it overjoys me to see the grief this is causing everyone else. I heard on the radio that ESPN would still broadcast the game on Sunday. Is this not correct? If it is, whats the big deal? Why would Louisville schedule the Ironman to go right by the stadium on a day they had a home football game scheduled? Everybody likes to whine about UK moving the football game back this year, but nobody mentions that UofL moved the basketball game back this year as well. You guys are too funny. Good to see you got the UK talking points email today...
February 26, 200818 yr Author As a UK fan, it overjoys me to see the grief this is causing everyone else. I heard on the radio that ESPN would still broadcast the game on Sunday. Is this not correct? If it is, whats the big deal? Why would Louisville schedule the Ironman to go right by the stadium on a day they had a home football game scheduled? Everybody likes to whine about UK moving the football game back this year, but nobody mentions that UofL moved the basketball game back this year as well. You guys are too funny. 1 - I am glad that you are owning the joy of it getting under our skins as fans. I wish Mitch would man up and do the same 2 - The football schedule is done after the Ironman logistics
February 26, 200818 yr I'd still like to see what Coach Brooks has to say on the situation. As it stands right now it looks more and more like Barnhart trying to get under UL's skin. Which is a shame, as high scoring as these two teams have been the last few seasons another good game or two in the series might convince ESPN to pick up the game whenever its played. I do think it would be worth the risk for UK to go ahead and move the game.
February 27, 200818 yr Good to see you got the UK talking points email today... Solid response to it as well... I think Brooks probably had some say in this also.
February 27, 200818 yr Solid response to it as well... I disagree. Awful petty to enjoy another fan base wanting what's best for their home game. What's good for the goose and what not. It sounds like Sunday is not an option and I would guess UL has nothing to do with scheduling something like an Ironman event. Wasn't the basketball game moved because of scheduling conflicts at Freedom Hall? Again out of the hands of UL. Pretty weak really...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.