June 22, 200719 yr There is a reason the two main recruiting services have not released 2010 rankings... I'll take my chances on a verbal commitment.
June 22, 200719 yr I'll take my chances on a verbal commitment. Um. Good for you. As far as I'm concerned the 2010 class is not yet ranked. When it is, I'm sure Euton will be in there. Just not sure where...
June 22, 200719 yr Um. Good for you. As far as I'm concerned the 2010 class is not yet ranked. When it is, I'm sure Euton will be in there. Just not sure where... Good for you too buddy. I respect your opinion. A verbal commitment is like a walkon in my opinion - nothing negative about it.
June 22, 200719 yr Hoopsreport.com 2010 Player rankings Top 15 FWIW Thanks Strike-3, but of course we all know that this isn't an official ranking service, so it doesn't count. Nice to see Euton in the top 15, though.
June 22, 200719 yr Thanks Strike-3, but of course we all know that this isn't an official ranking service, so it doesn't count. Nice to see Euton in the top 15, though. Now if Yahoo would buy them.....
June 22, 200719 yr Now if Yahoo would buy them..... Likely a good reason they aren't spending 100 million on Hoopsreport...
June 22, 200719 yr Likely a good reason they aren't spending 100 million on Hoopsreport... Yahoo is buying them for their content and eyes. Its no comment on quality, right?
June 22, 200719 yr Yahoo is buying them for their content and eyes. Its no comment on quality, right? If the content wasn't up to par there wouldn't be almost 200,000 paid subscribers, right???
June 22, 200719 yr If the content wasn't up to par there wouldn't be almost 200,000 paid subscribers, right??? Obviously, the content is solid. No argument. However, my point is that its not a statement as to who has the BEST content but , rather, who has good content with the MOST eyes. There could be many sites that are better.
June 22, 200719 yr Obviously, the content is solid. No argument. However, my point is that its not a statement as to who has the BEST content but , rather, who has good content with the MOST eyes. There could be many sites that are better. Could be? Sure. I've yet to see a site better than Scout and Rivals on a national level...
June 22, 200719 yr Could be? Sure. I've yet to see a site better than Scout and Rivals on a national level... You could be right when you qualify it. Again, my point is that we cannot disparage a smaller less reputable site simply because of lack of recognition.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.