June 21, 200719 yr One quote taken in a certain context. It gives them scheduling flexibility...bottom line. Doesn't matter to me, the game will still generate interest across this state. People said both sides would stop talking about the game...seems to be a lot of talking going on about it.
June 21, 200719 yr Bull butter. It is about them losing on National TV and the summer hype around the game. Anything else is bull butter. And you know I am right because even if that is not the reason, even if scheduling flexibility is the sole real reason, the PERCEPTION is that they are doing it to lessen the sting of a foregone L on the schedule. And they KNEW that was the perception because the idea had been shopped around for two years. And perception is reality when it comes to fan, recruits and media exposure so UK is reaping what the AD sowed. It was a poor move for a program that had been making positive strides. No hype for this game?
June 21, 200719 yr Author As clear as day, that quote says that Rich Brooks wanted the game moved off opening weekend for competitve reasons.
June 21, 200719 yr No hype for this game?Nothing compared to what it has been the only hype has been negitive hype against Barnhart and this not being on TV, nobody is comparing defense and offenses like they were this time last year. Nowhere near the talk on the Radio shows like last year. The first thing I learned in Political Science 301 was that perception is as or more dangerous than actual truth most the time. And the perception is (whether it is true or not) the Cats are trying to minimize the damage of a foregone loss to the Cards.
June 21, 200719 yr Just like many on here have let their blind loyalty to anything UK make them toe the party line like good little lemmings. I've seen blind hatred of UK wayyyyyyyyy too many times as well.
June 21, 200719 yr Nothing compared to what it has been the only hype has been negitive hype against Barnhart and this not being on TV, nobody is comparing defense and offenses like they were this time last year. Nowhere near the talk on the Radio shows like last year. They were talking about UK/UL in mid-June last year?
June 21, 200719 yr They were talking about UK/UL in mid-June last year? Try April till game day. Yes!! Absolutely, in fact Adam from the Afternoon Underdogs said the other day it was a good thing that Louisville had the Baseball team in the CWS because this year they didn't have UK U of L to talk about all summer. Sports talk 840, and 790
June 21, 200719 yr Try April till game day. Yes!! Sports talk 840, and 790 On a national level or just locally?
June 21, 200719 yr As clear as day, that quote says that Rich Brooks wanted the game moved off opening weekend for competitve reasons. "competitive reasons"? Gotta link?
June 21, 200719 yr Author http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070620/SPORTS/70620019
June 21, 200719 yr On a national level or just locally?Locally. UK football is not a national story. But the game sparked interest in football and lead to in my belief more interest even on the High School level. Here locally. Which in turn lead to a better high school product and better instate recruiting for both schools.
June 21, 200719 yr This game rarely gets national hype...rarely. Some guy on The Sporting News ranked it the 57th best game this year. 4th best on September 15th. I have seen the game mentioned in some preseason rags as a big game. Do you think they did this because it was not going to be on Labor Day Weekend?
June 21, 200719 yr To me, it's not a big deal.. For everyone else, Just buy a ticket and go to the game.
June 21, 200719 yr Author This game rarely gets national hype...rarely. Some guy on The Sporting News ranked it the 57th best game this year. 4th best on September 15th. I have seen the game mentioned in some preseason rags as a big game. Do you think they did this because it was not going to be on Labor Day Weekend? EXACTLY. Where would it have ranked on September 1st? Case closed.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.