April 16, 200719 yr UK should offer this kid.... Nope....Would definitely be more beneficial to hold that extra scholly for the 08' class.
April 16, 200719 yr Nope....Would definitely be more beneficial to hold that extra scholly for the 08' class. :thumb:
April 16, 200719 yr They'll need at least a couple of scholarships for 09... I will really be interested to see how that all plays out over the next couple of months/years. I think Pettigrew is going to be a good player regardless of whether or not he comes to UK... If he goes somewhere other than UK, it will be that "chip on the shoulder" mentality to show UK what they missed out on... If he does go to UK, I think he'll want to prove to everyone his worth and play out of his mind.
April 16, 200719 yr Nope....Would definitely be more beneficial to hold that extra scholly for the 08' class. Fine with me.....BUT...if he goes on to Xavier and then torches the Cats later...this would be the next "Why didn't we get" topic on here...
April 16, 200719 yr Fine with me.....BUT...if he goes on to Xavier and then torches the Cats later...this would be the next "Why didn't we get" topic on here... You're right. UK should just offer every Kentucky kid that gets an offer from a mid major. Doesn't really matter if they're good enough, or if they fill a need on the team. You're sounding like a member of the "Tubby should've known that Lofton would be better than Rondo/Bradley/Crawford! What an idiot!" club.
April 16, 200719 yr When did Xavier become a big time school? There are 17 teams in this country that have been to at least 17 of the last 25 NCAA Tourney's -- Xavier is one of them.
April 16, 200719 yr There are 17 teams in this country that have been to at least 17 of the last 25 NCAA Tourney's -- Xavier is one of them. Agreed. They may not be "big time," but if not, they're getting really close!
April 16, 200719 yr Fine with me.....BUT...if he goes on to Xavier and then torches the Cats later...this would be the next "Why didn't we get" topic on here... UK may play Xavier 1 time over the next 4-5 years, if that...It's not like going to a conference rival that you play 2, maybe 3 times a year...But, with that said, if he turns out to be a stud, the topic will definately arrise. Hopefully, the UK faithful will look back on this thread and say, well, we at least agreed with BG on this one...
April 16, 200719 yr There are 17 teams in this country that have been to at least 17 of the last 25 NCAA Tourney's -- Xavier is one of them. :thumb:
April 16, 200719 yr You're right. UK should just offer every Kentucky kid that gets an offer from a mid major. Doesn't really matter if they're good enough, or if they fill a need on the team. You're sounding like a member of the "Tubby should've known that Lofton would be better than Rondo/Bradley/Crawford! What an idiot!" club. No....but hindsight can get you burned.....like it did for Tubby...this kid isn't short...can play the two a little...I think he's worth 1 scholly.
April 16, 200719 yr Well obviously Pettigrew is borderline. I think there is a pretty good argument both ways. I do really like the fact he is a Kentucky kid. This is probably a very difficult decision for Billy G.
April 16, 200719 yr No....but hindsight can get you burned.....like it did for Tubby...this kid isn't short...can play the two a little...I think he's worth 1 scholly.I don't know anyone that thinks Pettigrew can play the two at a school of Kentucky's level. Bottom line ... he's a power forward, maybe a small forward in the right situation. If Pettigrew can play the three, he can play at a major school. Otherwise, he's a mid-major power forward ... and a potentially pretty good one.
April 16, 200719 yr Nope....Would definitely be more beneficial to hold that extra scholly for the 08' class. :thumb:
April 16, 200719 yr There are 17 teams in this country that have been to at least 17 of the last 25 NCAA Tourney's -- Xavier is one of them. Tubby's cats went 10 straight years and that got him ran out of town by the UK fans. Different expectations than that at UK. And a player that might fit well at X doesn't mean that they fit well at UK.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.